mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extreme Speech Classification in the Era of LLMs: Exploring Open-Source and Proprietary Models

arXiv 2502.15155 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, widespread internet adoption and the growth in userbase of various social media platforms have led to an increase in the proliferation of extreme speech online. While traditional language models have demonstrated proficiency in distinguishing between neutral text and non-neutral text (i.e. extreme speech), categorizing the diverse types of extreme speech presents significant challenges. The task of extreme speech classification is particularly nuanced, as it requires a deep understanding of socio-cultural contexts to accurately interpret the intent of the language used by the speaker. Even human annotators often disagree on the appropriate classification of such content, emphasizing the complex and subjective nature of this task. The use of human moderators also presents a scaling issue, necessitating the need for automated systems for extreme speech classification. The recent launch of ChatGPT has drawn global attention to the potential applications of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a diverse variety of tasks. Trained on vast and diverse corpora, and demonstrating the ability to effectively capture and encode contextual information, LLMs emerge as highly promising tools for tackling this specific task of extreme speech classification. In this paper, we leverage the Indian subset of the extreme speech dataset from Maronikolakis et al. (2022) to develop an effective classification framework using LLMs. We evaluate open-source Llama models against closed-source OpenAI models, finding that while pre-trained LLMs show moderate efficacy, fine-tuning with domain-specific data significantly enhances performance, highlighting their adaptability to linguistic and contextual nuances. Although GPT-based models outperform Llama models in zero-shot settings, the performance gap disappears after fine-tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  7. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  8. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  9. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offsetcited by 122
  10. 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitationscited by 100
  11. 2020Multilingual Offensive Language Identification with Cross-lingual Embeddingscited by 71
  12. 2018Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 59
7 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Text Classifierscited by 35
  2. 2024Hate Personified: Investigating the role of LLMs in content moderationcited by 25
  3. 2022Listening to Affected Communities to Define Extreme Speech: Dataset and Experimentscited by 22
  4. 2020Towards Hate Speech Detection at Large via Deep Generative Modelingcited by 12
  5. 2021Leveraging cross-platform data to improve automated hate speech detectioncited by 4
  6. 2022Hate Speech Classification Using SVM and Naive BAYEScited by 3
  7. 2022The Golden Circle: Creating Socio-technical Alignment in Content Moderationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.