mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GenAI Content Detection Task 2: AI vs. Human -- Academic Essay Authenticity Challenge

arXiv 2412.18274 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the first edition of the Academic Essay Authenticity Challenge, organized as part of the GenAI Content Detection shared tasks collocated with COLING 2025. This challenge focuses on detecting machine-generated vs. human-authored essays for academic purposes. The task is defined as follows: "Given an essay, identify whether it is generated by a machine or authored by a human.'' The challenge involves two languages: English and Arabic. During the evaluation phase, 25 teams submitted systems for English and 21 teams for Arabic, reflecting substantial interest in the task. Finally, seven teams submitted system description papers. The majority of submissions utilized fine-tuned transformer-based models, with one team employing Large Language Models (LLMs) such as Llama 2 and Llama 3. This paper outlines the task formulation, details the dataset construction process, and explains the evaluation framework. Additionally, we present a summary of the approaches adopted by participating teams. Nearly all submitted systems outperformed the n-gram-based baseline, with the top-performing systems achieving F1 scores exceeding 0.98 for both languages, indicating significant progress in the detection of machine-generated text.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2024.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  2. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  3. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  4. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
  5. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
  6. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
  7. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 121
  8. 2019DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networkscited by 100
  9. 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 90
  10. 2023CHEAT: A Large-scale Dataset for Detecting ChatGPT-writtEn AbsTractscited by 40
  11. 2023Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websitescited by 38
  12. 2023ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 37
5 more
  1. 2024GenQA: Generating Millions of Instructions from a Handful of Promptscited by 35
  2. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
  3. 2021Unsupervised and Distributional Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 23
  4. 2023Distinguishing ChatGPT(-3.5, -4)-generated and human-written papers through Japanese stylometric analysiscited by 16
  5. 2024GenAI Detection Tools, Adversarial Techniques and Implications for Inclusivity in Higher Educationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.