mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SHAPr: An Efficient and Versatile Membership Privacy Risk Metric for Machine Learning

arXiv 2112.02230 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2021cs.CR cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data used to train machine learning (ML) models can be sensitive. Membership inference attacks (MIAs), attempting to determine whether a particular data record was used to train an ML model, risk violating membership privacy. ML model builders need a principled definition of a metric to quantify the membership privacy risk of (a) individual training data records, (b) computed independently of specific MIAs, (c) which assesses susceptibility to different MIAs, (d) can be used for different applications, and (e) efficiently. None of the prior membership privacy risk metrics simultaneously meet all these requirements. We present SHAPr, a membership privacy metric based on Shapley values which is a leave-one-out (LOO) technique, originally intended to measure the contribution of a training data record on model utility. We conjecture that contribution to model utility can act as a proxy for memorization, and hence represent membership privacy risk. Using ten benchmark datasets, we show that SHAPr is indeed effective in estimating susceptibility of training data records to MIAs. We also show that, unlike prior work, SHAPr is significantly better in estimating susceptibility to newer, and more effective MIA. We apply SHAPr to evaluate the efficacy of several defenses against MIAs: using regularization and removing high risk training data records. Moreover, SHAPr is versatile: it can be used for estimating vulnerability of different subgroups to MIAs, and inherits applications of Shapley values (e.g., data valuation). We show that SHAPr has an acceptable computational cost (compared to naive LOO), varying from a few minutes for the smallest dataset to ~92 minutes for the largest dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2021.

Builds on

31 of 56 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  5. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  6. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  7. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  8. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
  9. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  10. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
  11. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  12. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
19 more
  1. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
  2. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
  3. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
  4. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  5. 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
  6. 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
  7. 2019Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership Inferencecited by 168
  8. 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 165
  9. 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 156
  10. 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 108
  11. 2019DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networkscited by 94
  12. 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 79
  13. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 79
  14. 2020ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learningcited by 66
  15. 2021Measuring Data Leakage in Machine-Learning Models with Fisher Informationcited by 31
  16. 2017Towards Measuring Membership Privacycited by 27
  17. 2020MACE: A Flexible Framework for Membership Privacy Estimation in Generative Modelscited by 5
  18. 2021Generalization Techniques Empirically Outperform Differential Privacy against Membership Inferencecited by 5
  19. 2020GECKO: Reconciling Privacy, Accuracy and Efficiency in Embedded Deep Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.