mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ADS-C: Antidistillation Sampling for Classification

arXiv 2607.15467 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge distillation enables an adversary to replicate a proprietary classifier by querying its prediction interface and training a surrogate on the returned probability vectors. Antidistillation sampling, proposed for large language models, counters this threat with an input-dependent, gradient-directed perturbation of the served distribution; its transfer to classification has not been studied. Adapting the defense to classification, we show its behavior is governed by the distribution of the teacher's per-input confidence margins. Because well-trained classifiers are severely overconfident, the direct transfer exhibits an inert window: below a closed-form-predictable threshold, it affects neither attacker nor defender; beyond it, the defense undergoes a phase transition and degrades the teacher faster than the attacker's student. Temperature softening rescales the transition in closed form, and every temperature configuration lies on the same unfavorable trade-off curve. Our method, ADS-C, composes the perturbation under a closed-form, per-input margin budget that provably preserves every served top-1 prediction, so the defended teacher's accuracy equals the undefended teacher's identically. Under this guarantee the distilled student still loses 17.4 percentage points on CIFAR-100, 29.6 on CIFAR-10, and 13.3 on Tiny-ImageNet; matching this degradation with the unmodified defense costs 27.5, 32.9, and 22.2 points of teacher accuracy. Because served labels are unchanged, a hard-label attacker gains nothing, while the defended soft output trains a student up to 29.7 points below that floor: the incentive to distill served probabilities is not merely removed but reversed. To our knowledge, ADS-C is the first antidistillation defense for classification whose utility cost is exactly zero.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

40 of 71 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  6. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  7. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  8. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  9. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  10. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  11. 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 539
  12. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
28 more
  1. 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
  2. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  3. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  4. 2024A Survey on Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 276
  5. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
  6. 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 144
  7. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
  8. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  9. 2019DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networkscited by 94
  10. 2020Understanding and Improving Knowledge Distillationcited by 83
  11. 2019Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 79
  12. 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
  13. 2022Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibrationcited by 48
  14. 2021Undistillable: Making A Nasty Teacher That CANNOT teach studentscited by 36
  15. 2022Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Robust Calibration of Deep Neural Networkscited by 24
  16. 2025Antidistillation Samplingcited by 24
  17. 2022Asymmetric Temperature Scaling Makes Larger Networks Teach Well Againcited by 23
  18. 2018Attended Temperature Scaling: A Practical Approach for Calibrating Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  19. 2025A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Modelscited by 18
  20. 2023Deep Intellectual Property Protection: A Surveycited by 16
  21. 2023Learning Lightweight Object Detectors via Multi-Teacher Progressive Distillationcited by 10
  22. 2025MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Modelscited by 8
  23. 2024Intellectual Property Protection for Deep Learning Model and Dataset Intelligencecited by 6
  24. 2026Towards Distillation-Resistant Large Language Models: An Information-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 5
  25. 2025Black-Box Behavioral Distillation Breaks Safety Alignment in Medical LLMscited by 4
  26. 2024Adversarial Sparse Teacher: Defense Against Distillation-Based Model Stealing Attacks Using Adversarial Examplescited by 2
  27. 2024MisGUIDE : Defense Against Data-Free Deep Learning Model Extractioncited by 2
  28. 2025RADEP: A Resilient Adaptive Defense Framework Against Model Extraction Attackscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.