mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs

arXiv 1904.06505 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2019cs.CV cs.MMcited by 73

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective assessment of image quality is fundamentally important in many image processing tasks. In this work, we focus on learning blind image quality assessment (BIQA) models which predict the quality of a digital image with no access to its original pristine-quality counterpart as reference. One of the biggest challenges in learning BIQA models is the conflict between the gigantic image space (which is in the dimension of the number of image pixels) and the extremely limited reliable ground truth data for training. Such data are typically collected via subjective testing, which is cumbersome, slow, and expensive. Here we first show that a vast amount of reliable training data in the form of quality-discriminable image pairs (DIP) can be obtained automatically at low cost by exploiting large-scale databases with diverse image content. We then learn an opinion-unaware BIQA (OU-BIQA, meaning that no subjective opinions are used for training) model using RankNet, a pairwise learning-to-rank (L2R) algorithm, from millions of DIPs, each associated with a perceptual uncertainty level, leading to a DIP inferred quality (dipIQ) index. Extensive experiments on four benchmark IQA databases demonstrate that dipIQ outperforms state-of-the-art OU-BIQA models. The robustness of dipIQ is also significantly improved as confirmed by the group MAximum Differentiation (gMAD) competition method. Furthermore, we extend the proposed framework by learning models with ListNet (a listwise L2R algorithm) on quality-discriminable image lists (DIL). The resulting DIL Inferred Quality (dilIQ) index achieves an additional performance gain.

Key facts. Cited by 73 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 17; 2022: 14; 2023: 6; 2024: 19; 2025: 9; 2026: 8.

73 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 514
  2. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  3. 2024Towards Open-ended Visual Quality Comparisoncited by 85
  4. 2025VisualQuality-R1: Reasoning-Induced Image Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning to Rankcited by 77
  5. 2024Adaptive Image Quality Assessment via Teaching Large Multimodal Model to Comparecited by 66
  6. 2024Diffusion Models, Image Super-Resolution And Everything: A Surveycited by 63
  7. 2021Learning Conditional Knowledge Distillation for Degraded-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
  8. 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
  9. 2024Quality-Aware Image-Text Alignment for Opinion-Unaware Image Quality Assessmentcited by 31
  10. 2022Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical Fidelitycited by 24
  11. 2021A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-based Single Image Super-resolutioncited by 23
  12. 2022Going the Extra Mile in Face Image Quality Assessment: A Novel Database and Modelcited by 22
38 more
  1. 2022Hitchhiker's Guide to Super-Resolution: Introduction and Recent Advancescited by 21
  2. 2021Quantifying Visual Image Quality: A Bayesian Viewcited by 20
  3. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Hallucinating Pristine Featurescited by 16
  4. 2023Quality-aware Pre-trained Models for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 15
  5. 2022Content-Variant Reference Image Quality Assessment via Knowledge Distillationcited by 14
  6. 2024PromptIQA: Boosting the Performance and Generalization for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Promptscited by 14
  7. 2021Spatial Attention-based Non-reference Perceptual Quality Prediction Network for Omnidirectional Imagescited by 12
  8. 2021A Deep Insight into Measuring Face Image Utility with General and Face-specific Image Quality Metricscited by 12
  9. 2024Opinion-Unaware Blind Image Quality Assessment using Multi-Scale Deep Feature Statisticscited by 11
  10. 2022UIF: An Objective Quality Assessment for Underwater Image Enhancementcited by 10
  11. 2025Self-Evolving Vision-Language Models for Image Quality Assessment via Voting and Rankingcited by 10
  12. 2021Artifact- and content-specific quality assessment for MRI with image rulerscited by 8
  13. 2022Face Morphing Attacks and Face Image Quality: The Effect of Morphing and the Unsupervised Attack Detection by Qualitycited by 8
  14. 2023Deep Ensembling for Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 8
  15. 2023On the Effectiveness of Spectral Discriminators for Perceptual Quality Improvementcited by 8
  16. 2024AI-generated Image Quality Assessment in Visual Communicationcited by 7
  17. 2021Semi-Supervised Deep Ensembles for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 6
  18. 2021A survey on IQAcited by 6
  19. 2022REQA: Coarse-to-fine Assessment of Image Quality to Alleviate the Range Effectcited by 6
  20. 2023PIQI: Perceptual Image Quality Index based on Ensemble of Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 6
  21. 2024PCQA: A Strong Baseline for AIGC Quality Assessment Based on Prompt Conditioncited by 6
  22. 2021Degraded Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  23. 2022Generalized Visual Quality Assessment of GAN-Generated Face Imagescited by 5
  24. 2022Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approachescited by 5
  25. 2022Dehazed Image Quality Evaluation: From Partial Discrepancy to Blind Perceptioncited by 5
  26. 2024Deep Shape-Texture Statistics for Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluationcited by 5
  27. 2024GMC-IQA: Exploiting Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  28. 2021Blind VQA on 360deg Video via Progressively Learning from Pixels, Frames and Videocited by 4
  29. 2024Learning semantic image quality for fetal ultrasound from noisy ranking annotationcited by 4
  30. 2021Deep Neural Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment: Addressing the Data Challengecited by 3
  31. 2024DDR: Exploiting Deep Degradation Response as Flexible Image Descriptorcited by 3
  32. 2024Deep Bayesian Active Learning-to-Rank with Relative Annotation for Estimation of Ulcerative Colitis Severitycited by 3
  33. 2025Exploring Semantic Feature Discrimination for Perceptual Image Super-Resolution and Opinion-Unaware No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 3
  34. 2021Deep Image Debandingcited by 2
  35. 2024Perceptual Depth Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Omnidirectional Imagescited by 2
  36. 2025Max360IQ: Blind Omnidirectional Image Quality Assessment with Multi-axis Attentioncited by 2
  37. 2021Learning Transformer Features for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  38. 2022Quality Assessment of Low Light Restored Images: A Subjective Study and an Unsupervised Modelcited by 1

50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)