mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

No-reference geometry quality assessment for colorless point clouds via list-wise rank learning

arXiv 2502.11726 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Geometry quality assessment (GQA) of colorless point clouds is crucial for evaluating the performance of emerging point cloud-based solutions (e.g., watermarking, compression, and 3-Dimensional (3D) reconstruction). Unfortunately, existing objective GQA approaches are traditional full-reference metrics, whereas state-of-the-art learning-based point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) methods target both color and geometry distortions, neither of which are qualified for the no-reference GQA task. In addition, the lack of large-scale GQA datasets with subjective scores, which are always imprecise, biased, and inconsistent, also hinders the development of learning-based GQA metrics. Driven by these limitations, this paper proposes a no-reference geometry-only quality assessment approach based on list-wise rank learning, termed LRL-GQA, which comprises of a geometry quality assessment network (GQANet) and a list-wise rank learning network (LRLNet). The proposed LRL-GQA formulates the no-reference GQA as a list-wise rank problem, with the objective of directly optimizing the entire quality ordering. Specifically, a large dataset containing a variety of geometry-only distortions is constructed first, named LRL dataset, in which each sample is label-free but coupled with quality ranking information. Then, the GQANet is designed to capture intrinsic multi-scale patch-wise geometric features in order to predict a quality index for each point cloud. After that, the LRLNet leverages the LRL dataset and a likelihood loss to train the GQANet and ranks the input list of degraded point clouds according to their distortion levels. In addition, the pre-trained GQANet can be fine-tuned further to obtain absolute quality scores. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed no-reference LRL-GQA method compared with existing full-reference GQA metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

20 of 67 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  3. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  4. 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 732
  5. 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 151
  6. 2019A Deep Look into Neural Ranking Models for Information Retrievalcited by 79
  7. 2019dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairscited by 73
  8. 2020Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similaritycited by 58
  9. 2020Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metriccited by 53
  10. 2020Pointfilter: Point Cloud Filtering via Encoder-Decoder Modelingcited by 50
  11. 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Modelscited by 50
  12. 2021Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Cloudscited by 49
8 more
  1. 20183D Point Cloud Denoising using Graph Laplacian Regularization of a Low Dimensional Manifold Modelcited by 47
  2. 2021No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain Adaptationcited by 38
  3. 2013Learning to Rank for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 25
  4. 2019Point Cloud Rendering after Coding: Impacts on Subjective and Objective Qualitycited by 23
  5. 2022GPA-Net:No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment with Multi-task Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 22
  6. 2023BASICS: Broad quality Assessment of Static point clouds In Compression Scenarioscited by 20
  7. 2020Subjective Quality Database and Objective Study of Compressed Point Clouds With 6DoF Head-Mounted Displaycited by 17
  8. 2021Twice Mixing: A Rank Learning based Quality Assessment Approach for Underwater Image Enhancementcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Reduced Reference Quality Assessment for Point Cloud Compression
  2. 2026GT-PCQA: Geometry-Texture Decoupled Point Cloud Quality Assessment with MLLM
  3. 2024LMM-PCQA: Assisting Point Cloud Quality Assessment with LMM
  4. 2026PCQA-R1: Advancing Generalized 3D Point Cloud Quality Assessment with Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026PointQ-Bench: Benchmarking Diagnostic and Interpretable Point Cloud Quality Assessment
  6. 2025PIT-QMM: A Large Multimodal Model For No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment
  7. 2024Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Clouds
  8. 2025CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality Assessment