Deep Neural Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment: Addressing the Data Challenge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The enormous space and diversity of natural images is usually represented by a few small-scale human-rated image quality assessment (IQA) datasets. This casts great challenges to deep neural network (DNN) based blind IQA (BIQA), which requires large-scale training data that is representative of the natural image distribution. It is extremely difficult to create human-rated IQA datasets composed of millions of images due to constraints of subjective testing. While a number of efforts have focused on design innovations to enhance the performance of DNN based BIQA, attempts to address the scarcity of labeled IQA data remain surprisingly missing. To address this data challenge, we construct so far the largest IQA database, namely Waterloo Exploration-II, which contains 3,570 pristine reference and around 3.45 million singly and multiply distorted images. Since subjective testing for such a large dataset is nearly impossible, we develop a novel mechanism that synthetically assigns perceptual quality labels to the distorted images. We construct a DNN-based BIQA model called EONSS, train it on Waterloo Exploration-II, and test it on nine subject-rated IQA datasets, without any retraining or fine-tuning. The results show that with a straightforward DNN architecture, EONSS is able to outperform the very state-of-the-art in BIQA, both in terms of quality prediction performance and execution speed. This study strongly supports the view that the quantity and quality of meaningfully annotated training data, rather than a sophisticated network architecture or training strategy, is the dominating factor that determines the performance of DNN-based BIQA models. (Note: Since this is an ongoing project, the final versions of Waterloo Exploration-II database, quality annotations, and EONSS, will be made publicly available in the future when it culminates.)
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 127 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2021.
Builds on
21 of 127 references.
References · 21
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2016End-to-end Optimized Image Compressioncited by 673
- 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
- 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
- 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
- 2014Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embeddingcited by 287
- 2013OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networkscited by 224
9 more
- 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
- 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
- 2013Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Indexcited by 193
- 2014Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Netscited by 122
- 2019dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairscited by 73
- 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
- 2016On the Use of Deep Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 34
- 2018KonIQ-10k: Towards an ecologically valid and large-scale IQA databasecited by 14
- 2017A Detail Based Method for Linear Full Reference Image Quality Predictioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.