Semi-Supervised Deep Ensembles for Blind Image Quality Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensemble methods are generally regarded to be better than a single model if the base learners are deemed to be "accurate" and "diverse." Here we investigate a semi-supervised ensemble learning strategy to produce generalizable blind image quality assessment models. We train a multi-head convolutional network for quality prediction by maximizing the accuracy of the ensemble (as well as the base learners) on labeled data, and the disagreement (i.e., diversity) among them on unlabeled data, both implemented by the fidelity loss. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the advantages of employing unlabeled data for BIQA, especially in model generalization and failure identification.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2021.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
- 2020Long-tailed Recognition by Routing Diverse Distribution-Aware Expertscited by 271
- 2017NormFace: L2 Hypersphere Embedding for Face Verificationcited by 237
- 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
- 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
- 2015Why M Heads are Better than One: Training a Diverse Ensemble of Deep Networkscited by 139
- 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
4 more
- 2019dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairscited by 73
- 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
- 2020Active Fine-Tuning from gMAD Examples Improves Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 24
- 2020Generalized Negative Correlation Learning for Deep Ensemblingcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Incorporating Semi-Supervised and Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Boosting Full Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 12
- 2022A Quality Index Metric and Method for Online Self-Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles Sensory Perceptioncited by 10
- 2023Knowledge Guided Semi-Supervised Learning for Quality Assessment of User Generated Videoscited by 7
- 2022Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approachescited by 5
- 2023Cross-Dataset-Robust Method for Blind Real-World Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
- 2025MetaQAP - A Meta-Learning Approach for Quality-Aware Pretraining in Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2025MetaQAP - A Meta-Learning Approach for Quality-Aware Pretraining in Image Quality Assessment19 Jun 2025
- 2023Knowledge Guided Semi-Supervised Learning for Quality Assessment of User Generated Videos24 Dec 2023
- 2023Cross-Dataset-Robust Method for Blind Real-World Image Quality Assessment26 Sep 2023
- 2022Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approaches29 Jul 2022
- 2022Incorporating Semi-Supervised and Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Boosting Full Reference Image Quality Assessment19 Apr 2022
- 2022A Quality Index Metric and Method for Online Self-Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles Sensory Perception4 Mar 2022