mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GMC-IQA: Exploiting Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency for No-reference Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 2401.10511 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the subjective nature of image quality assessment (IQA), assessing which image has better quality among a sequence of images is more reliable than assigning an absolute mean opinion score for an image. Thus, IQA models are evaluated by global correlation consistency (GCC) metrics like PLCC and SROCC, rather than mean opinion consistency (MOC) metrics like MAE and MSE. However, most existing methods adopt MOC metrics to define their loss functions, due to the infeasible computation of GCC metrics during training. In this work, we construct a novel loss function and network to exploit Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency, forming a GMC-IQA framework. Specifically, we propose a novel GCC loss by defining a pairwise preference-based rank estimation to solve the non-differentiable problem of SROCC and introducing a queue mechanism to reserve previous data to approximate the global results of the whole data. Moreover, we propose a mean-opinion network, which integrates diverse opinion features to alleviate the randomness of weight learning and enhance the model robustness. Experiments indicate that our method outperforms SOTA methods on multiple authentic datasets with higher accuracy and generalization. We also adapt the proposed loss to various networks, which brings better performance and more stable training.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2024.

Builds on

18 of 33 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  4. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 522
  5. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  6. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
  7. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 209
  8. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
  9. 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 151
  10. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  11. 2023Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wildcited by 97
  12. 2021Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learningcited by 95
6 more
  1. 2019dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairscited by 73
  2. 2020Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 54
  3. 2018Hallucinated-IQA: No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Adversarial Learningcited by 49
  4. 2023Data-Efficient Image Quality Assessment with Attention-Panel Decodercited by 49
  5. 2013Learning to Rank for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 25
  6. 2019Learning to Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.