UIF: An Objective Quality Assessment for Underwater Image Enhancement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to complex and volatile lighting environment, underwater imaging can be readily impaired by light scattering, warping, and noises. To improve the visual quality, Underwater Image Enhancement (UIE) techniques have been widely studied. Recent efforts have also been contributed to evaluate and compare the UIE performances with subjective and objective methods. However, the subjective evaluation is time-consuming and uneconomic for all images, while existing objective methods have limited capabilities for the newly-developed UIE approaches based on deep learning. To fill this gap, we propose an Underwater Image Fidelity (UIF) metric for objective evaluation of enhanced underwater images. By exploiting the statistical features of these images, we present to extract naturalness-related, sharpness-related, and structure-related features. Among them, the naturalness-related and sharpness-related features evaluate visual improvement of enhanced images; the structure-related feature indicates structural similarity between images before and after UIE. Then, we employ support vector regression to fuse the above three features into a final UIF metric. In addition, we have also established a large-scale UIE database with subjective scores, namely Underwater Image Enhancement Database (UIED), which is utilized as a benchmark to compare all objective metrics. Experimental results confirm that the proposed UIF outperforms a variety of underwater and general-purpose image quality metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2022.
Builds on
4 of 43 references.
References · 4
- 2019Deep Learning for Image Super-resolution: A Surveycited by 368
- 2019An Underwater Image Enhancement Benchmark Dataset and Beyondcited by 250
- 2019dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairscited by 73
- 2019Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Datacited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Exploring the Naturalness of AI-Generated Imagescited by 22
- 2025UniUIR: Considering Underwater Image Restoration as An All-in-One Learnercited by 20
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Deep Learningcited by 9
- 2024FDCE-Net: Underwater Image Enhancement with Embedding Frequency and Dual Color Encodercited by 8
- 2023Blind Multimodal Quality Assessment of Low-light Imagescited by 4
- 2023A Semi-supervised Physics-Aware Triple-Stream Underwater Image Enhancement Networkcited by 1
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Brief Surveycited by 1
- 2024StreakNet-Arch: An Anti-scattering Network-based Architecture for Underwater Carrier LiDAR-Radar Imagingcited by 1
- 2024PIGUIQA: A Physical Imaging Guided Perceptual Framework for Underwater Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026Retinex Meets Language: A Physics-Semantics-Guided Underwater Image Enhancement Networkcited by 0
- 2026Retinex Meets Language: A Physics-Semantics-Guided Underwater Image Enhancement Network7 Mar 2026
- 2025UniUIR: Considering Underwater Image Restoration as An All-in-One Learner22 Jan 2025
- 2024PIGUIQA: A Physical Imaging Guided Perceptual Framework for Underwater Image Quality Assessment20 Dec 2024
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Deep Learning30 May 2024
- 2024FDCE-Net: Underwater Image Enhancement with Embedding Frequency and Dual Color Encoder27 Apr 2024
- 2024StreakNet-Arch: An Anti-scattering Network-based Architecture for Underwater Carrier LiDAR-Radar Imaging14 Apr 2024
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey27 Dec 2023
- 2023Exploring the Naturalness of AI-Generated Images9 Dec 2023
- 2023A Semi-supervised Physics-Aware Triple-Stream Underwater Image Enhancement Network21 Jul 2023
- 2023Blind Multimodal Quality Assessment of Low-light Images18 Mar 2023