mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accelerating Integrated Task and Motion Planning with Neural Feasibility Checking

arXiv 2203.10568 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2022cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As robots play an increasingly important role in the industrial, the expectations about their applications for everyday living tasks are getting higher. Robots need to perform long-horizon tasks that consist of several sub-tasks that need to be accomplished. Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) provides a hierarchical framework to handle the sequential nature of manipulation tasks by interleaving a symbolic task planner that generates a possible action sequence, with a motion planner that checks the kinematic feasibility in the geometric world, generating robot trajectories if several constraints are satisfied, e.g., a collision-free trajectory from one state to another. Hence, the reasoning about the task plan's geometric grounding is taken over by the motion planner. However, motion planning is computationally intense and is usability as feasibility checker casts TAMP methods inapplicable to real-world scenarios. In this paper, we introduce neural feasibility classifier (NFC), a simple yet effective visual heuristic for classifying the feasibility of proposed actions in TAMP. Namely, NFC will identify infeasible actions of the task planner without the need for costly motion planning, hence reducing planning time in multi-step manipulation tasks. NFC encodes the image of the robot's workspace into a feature map thanks to convolutional neural network (CNN). We train NFC using simulated data from TAMP problems and label the instances based on IK feasibility checking. Our empirical results in different simulated manipulation tasks show that our NFC generalizes to the entire robot workspace and has high prediction accuracy even in scenes with multiple obstructions. When combined with state-of-the-art integrated TAMP, our NFC enhances its performance while reducing its planning time.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2022.

Builds on

9 of 26 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
  2. 2017Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metricscited by 259
  3. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
  4. 2017Learning Sampling Distributions for Robot Motion Planningcited by 79
  5. 2021Learning Symbolic Operators for Task and Motion Planningcited by 57
  6. 2020Deep Visual Reasoning: Learning to Predict Action Sequences for Task and Motion Planning from an Initial Scene Imagecited by 45
  7. 2018Learning to guide task and motion planning using score-space representationcited by 27
  8. 2021Extended Tree Search for Robot Task and Motion Planningcited by 14
  9. 2014Experience-Based Planning with Sparse Roadmap Spannerscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

10 papers.