mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey on the Integration of Machine Learning with Sampling-based Motion Planning

arXiv 2211.08368 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2022cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sampling-based methods are widely adopted solutions for robot motion planning. The methods are straightforward to implement, effective in practice for many robotic systems. It is often possible to prove that they have desirable properties, such as probabilistic completeness and asymptotic optimality. Nevertheless, they still face challenges as the complexity of the underlying planning problem increases, especially under tight computation time constraints, which impact the quality of returned solutions or given inaccurate models. This has motivated machine learning to improve the computational efficiency and applicability of Sampling-Based Motion Planners (SBMPs). This survey reviews such integrative efforts and aims to provide a classification of the alternative directions that have been explored in the literature. It first discusses how learning has been used to enhance key components of SBMPs, such as node sampling, collision detection, distance or nearest neighbor computation, local planning, and termination conditions. Then, it highlights planners that use learning to adaptively select between different implementations of such primitives in response to the underlying problem's features. It also covers emerging methods, which build complete machine learning pipelines that reflect the traditional structure of SBMPs. It also discusses how machine learning has been used to provide data-driven models of robots, which can then be used by a SBMP. Finally, it provides a comparative discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches covered, and insights on possible future directions of research. An online version of this survey can be found at: https://prx-kinodynamic.github.io/

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 125 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

Builds on

53 of 125 references.

References · 53

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  3. 2019A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithmscited by 136
  4. 2018The Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning for Roboticscited by 104
  5. 2017Learning Sampling Distributions for Robot Motion Planningcited by 79
  6. 2018Motion Planning Networkscited by 78
  7. 2017PRM-RL: Long-range Robotic Navigation Tasks by Combining Reinforcement Learning and Sampling-based Planningcited by 64
  8. 2017Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Motion Planning via Probabilistic Inferencecited by 49
  9. 2020Learning compositional models of robot skills for task and motion planningcited by 47
  10. 2018Robot Motion Planning in Learned Latent Spacescited by 40
  11. 2021Long-Horizon Manipulation of Unknown Objects via Task and Motion Planning with Estimated Affordancescited by 38
  12. 2017Learning Heuristic Search via Imitationcited by 34
38 more
  1. 2018Learning to guide task and motion planning using score-space representationcited by 27
  2. 2020Broadly-Exploring, Local-Policy Trees for Long-Horizon Task Planningcited by 26
  3. 2013Fast Marching Tree: a Fast Marching Sampling-Based Method for Optimal Motion Planning in Many Dimensionscited by 25
  4. 2017Batch Informed Trees (BIT*): Informed Asymptotically Optimal Anytime Searchcited by 22
  5. 2019Harnessing Reinforcement Learning for Neural Motion Planningcited by 19
  6. 2019LEGO: Leveraging Experience in Roadmap Generation for Sampling-Based Planningcited by 19
  7. 2019Learning to Plan in High Dimensions via Neural Exploration-Exploitation Treescited by 18
  8. 2019Learned Critical Probabilistic Roadmaps for Robotic Motion Planningcited by 18
  9. 2014Asymptotically Optimal Sampling-based Kinodynamic Planningcited by 17
  10. 2019Learning-Based Proxy Collision Detection for Robot Motion Planning Applicationscited by 17
  11. 2019RL-RRT: Kinodynamic Motion Planning via Learning Reachability Estimators from RL Policiescited by 17
  12. 2019Generalized Lazy Search for Robot Motion Planning: Interleaving Search and Edge Evaluation via Event-based Togglescited by 16
  13. 2021MotionBenchMaker: A Tool to Generate and Benchmark Motion Planning Datasetscited by 16
  14. 2022Reducing Collision Checking for Sampling-Based Motion Planning Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 16
  15. 2020Neural Manipulation Planning on Constraint Manifoldscited by 15
  16. 2020Learning Obstacle Representations for Neural Motion Planningcited by 13
  17. 2020Learning Sampling Distributions Using Local 3D Workspace Decompositions for Motion Planning in High Dimensionscited by 12
  18. 2014Experience-Based Planning with Sparse Roadmap Spannerscited by 10
  19. 2020Dynamically Constrained Motion Planning Networks for Non-Holonomic Robotscited by 9
  20. 2020Learning Equality Constraints for Motion Planning on Manifoldscited by 9
  21. 2020Constrained Motion Planning Networks Xcited by 9
  22. 2015Asymptotically Optimal Planning by Feasible Kinodynamic Planning in State-Cost Spacecited by 8
  23. 2019Using Local Experiences for Global Motion Planningcited by 8
  24. 2021MPC-MPNet: Model-Predictive Motion Planning Networks for Fast, Near-Optimal Planning under Kinodynamic Constraintscited by 7
  25. 2020Cost-to-Go Function Generating Networks for High Dimensional Motion Planningcited by 6
  26. 2020Planning and Execution using Inaccurate Models with Provable Guaranteescited by 5
  27. 2022Learning to Retrieve Relevant Experiences for Motion Planningcited by 5
  28. 2016Collision detection or nearest-neighbor search? On the computational bottleneck in sampling-based motion planningcited by 3
  29. 2019Leveraging Experience in Lazy Searchcited by 3
  30. 2019Neural Collision Clearance Estimator for Batched Motion Planningcited by 3
  31. 2020Learning When to Trust a Dynamics Model for Planning in Reduced State Spacescited by 3
  32. 2021Learning When to Quit: Meta-Reasoning for Motion Planningcited by 3
  33. 2013Free-configuration Biased Sampling for Motion Planning: Erratacited by 2
  34. 2017Near-Optimal Edge Evaluation in Explicit Generalized Binomial Graphscited by 2
  35. 2017Bayesian Active Edge Evaluation on Expensive Graphscited by 2
  36. 2019Refined Analysis of Asymptotically-Optimal Kinodynamic Planning in the State-Cost Spacecited by 2
  37. 2019Asymptotically Optimal Sampling-based Plannerscited by 2
  38. 2020Posterior Sampling for Anytime Motion Planning on Graphs with Expensive-to-Evaluate Edgescited by 2

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.