mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Policy-Guided Lazy Search with Feedback for Task and Motion Planning

arXiv 2210.14055 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2022cs.RO cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

PDDLStream solvers have recently emerged as viable solutions for Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) problems, extending PDDL to problems with continuous action spaces. Prior work has shown how PDDLStream problems can be reduced to a sequence of PDDL planning problems, which can then be solved using off-the-shelf planners. However, this approach can suffer from long runtimes. In this paper we propose LAZY, a solver for PDDLStream problems that maintains a single integrated search over action skeletons, which gets progressively more geometrically informed, as samples of possible motions are lazily drawn during motion planning. We explore how learned models of goal-directed policies and current motion sampling data can be incorporated in LAZY to adaptively guide the task planner. We show that this leads to significant speed-ups in the search for a feasible solution evaluated over unseen test environments of varying numbers of objects, goals, and initial conditions. We evaluate our TAMP approach by comparing to existing solvers for PDDLStream problems on a range of simulated 7DoF rearrangement/manipulation problems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 33 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  3. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  4. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
  5. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
  6. 2020Hierarchical Planning for Long-Horizon Manipulation with Geometric and Symbolic Scene Graphscited by 83
  7. 2019Online Replanning in Belief Space for Partially Observable Task and Motion Problemscited by 60
  8. 2021Learning Symbolic Operators for Task and Motion Planningcited by 57
  9. 2020Learning compositional models of robot skills for task and motion planningcited by 47
  10. 2020Deep Visual Reasoning: Learning to Predict Action Sequences for Task and Motion Planning from an Initial Scene Imagecited by 45
  11. 2020Planning with Learned Object Importance in Large Problem Instances using Graph Neural Networkscited by 38
  12. 2018Learning to guide task and motion planning using score-space representationcited by 27
6 more
  1. 2018Single-Agent Policy Tree Search With Guaranteescited by 22
  2. 2020Transferable Task Execution from Pixels through Deep Planning Domain Learningcited by 17
  3. 2021Extended Tree Search for Robot Task and Motion Planningcited by 14
  4. 2022Accelerating Integrated Task and Motion Planning with Neural Feasibility Checkingcited by 10
  5. 2021Learning to Search in Task and Motion Planning with Streamscited by 9
  6. 2017The Provable Virtue of Laziness in Motion Planningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.