mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

QUEEN: Query Unlearning against Model Extraction

arXiv 2407.01251 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Model extraction attacks currently pose a non-negligible threat to the security and privacy of deep learning models. By querying the model with a small dataset and usingthe query results as the ground-truth labels, an adversary can steal a piracy model with performance comparable to the original model. Two key issues that cause the threat are, on the one hand, accurate and unlimited queries can be obtained by the adversary; on the other hand, the adversary can aggregate the query results to train the model step by step. The existing defenses usually employ model watermarking or fingerprinting to protect the ownership. However, these methods cannot proactively prevent the violation from happening. To mitigate the threat, we propose QUEEN (QUEry unlEarNing) that proactively launches counterattacks on potential model extraction attacks from the very beginning. To limit the potential threat, QUEEN has sensitivity measurement and outputs perturbation that prevents the adversary from training a piracy model with high performance. In sensitivity measurement, QUEEN measures the single query sensitivity by its distance from the center of its cluster in the feature space. To reduce the learning accuracy of attacks, for the highly sensitive query batch, QUEEN applies query unlearning, which is implemented by gradient reverse to perturb the softmax output such that the piracy model will generate reverse gradients to worsen its performance unconsciously. Experiments show that QUEEN outperforms the state-of-the-art defenses against various model extraction attacks with a relatively low cost to the model accuracy. The artifact is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/queen implementation-5408/.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 32 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.

Builds on

32 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  2. 2023Boundary Unlearning21 Mar

Other references · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  4. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  5. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  6. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  7. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  8. 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 237
  9. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  10. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
  11. 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 144
  12. 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
18 more
  1. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  2. 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
  3. 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectorycited by 93
  4. 2019Deep Neural Network Fingerprinting by Conferrable Adversarial Examplescited by 90
  5. 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 85
  6. 2019Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 79
  7. 2018Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Datacited by 69
  8. 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 67
  9. 2023Are You Copying My Model? Protecting the Copyright of Large Language Models for EaaS via Backdoor Watermarkcited by 61
  10. 2022Use All The Labels: A Hierarchical Multi-Label Contrastive Learning Frameworkcited by 59
  11. 2022Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networks Globally via Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 58
  12. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 57
  13. 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 55
  14. 2022SSLGuard: A Watermarking Scheme for Self-supervised Learning Pre-trained Encoderscited by 43
  15. 2022Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Workcited by 21
  16. 2022Are You Stealing My Model? Sample Correlation for Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  17. 2018Defending Against Machine Learning Model Stealing Attacks Using Deceptive Perturbationscited by 11
  18. 2019Implementing the Exponential Mechanism with Base-2 Differential Privacycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

9 papers.