mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SODA: Protecting Proprietary Information in On-Device Machine Learning Models

arXiv 2312.15036 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.CR cs.DCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growth of low-end hardware has led to a proliferation of machine learning-based services in edge applications. These applications gather contextual information about users and provide some services, such as personalized offers, through a machine learning (ML) model. A growing practice has been to deploy such ML models on the user's device to reduce latency, maintain user privacy, and minimize continuous reliance on a centralized source. However, deploying ML models on the user's edge device can leak proprietary information about the service provider. In this work, we investigate on-device ML models that are used to provide mobile services and demonstrate how simple attacks can leak proprietary information of the service provider. We show that different adversaries can easily exploit such models to maximize their profit and accomplish content theft. Motivated by the need to thwart such attacks, we present an end-to-end framework, SODA, for deploying and serving on edge devices while defending against adversarial usage. Our results demonstrate that SODA can detect adversarial usage with 89% accuracy in less than 50 queries with minimal impact on service performance, latency, and storage.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  2. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  3. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  4. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  5. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  6. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  7. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  8. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
  9. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
  10. 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
  11. 2019Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 79
  12. 2018Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Datacited by 69
4 more
  1. 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 55
  2. 2017Model Extraction Warning in MLaaS Paradigmcited by 39
  3. 2017Efficient Transfer Learning Schemes for Personalized Language Modeling using Recurrent Neural Networkcited by 5
  4. 2021Preserving Privacy in Personalized Models for Distributed Mobile Servicescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.