Stealing and Evading Malware Classifiers and Antivirus at Low False Positive Conditions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model stealing attacks have been successfully used in many machine learning domains, but there is little understanding of how these attacks work against models that perform malware detection. Malware detection and, in general, security domains have unique conditions. In particular, there are very strong requirements for low false positive rates (FPR). Antivirus products (AVs) that use machine learning are very complex systems to steal, malware binaries continually change, and the whole environment is adversarial by nature. This study evaluates active learning model stealing attacks against publicly available stand-alone machine learning malware classifiers and also against antivirus products. The study proposes a new neural network architecture for surrogate models (dualFFNN) and a new model stealing attack that combines transfer and active learning for surrogate creation (FFNN-TL). We achieved good surrogates of the stand-alone classifiers with up to 99% agreement with the target models, using less than 4% of the original training dataset. Good surrogates of AV systems were also trained with up to 99% agreement and less than 4,000 queries. The study uses the best surrogates to generate adversarial malware to evade the target models, both stand-alone and AVs (with and without an internet connection). Results show that surrogate models can generate adversarial malware that evades the targets but with a lower success rate than directly using the target models to generate adversarial malware. Using surrogates, however, is still a good option since using the AVs for malware generation is highly time-consuming and easily detected when the AVs are connected to the internet.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2022.
Builds on
24 of 52 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
- 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
- 2018EMBER: An Open Dataset for Training Static PE Malware Machine Learning Modelscited by 164
- 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 144
12 more
- 2018Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extractioncited by 84
- 2018Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Datacited by 69
- 2020Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Modelscited by 65
- 2018Learning to Evade Static PE Machine Learning Malware Models via Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2020Functionality-preserving Black-box Optimization of Adversarial Windows Malwarecited by 58
- 2020SOREL-20M: A Large Scale Benchmark Dataset for Malicious PE Detectioncited by 49
- 2018Digital Watermarking for Deep Neural Networkscited by 37
- 2020Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detectioncited by 18
- 2019ALOHA: Auxiliary Loss Optimization for Hypothesis Augmentationcited by 9
- 2020Generating End-to-End Adversarial Examples for Malware Classifiers Using Explainabilitycited by 9
- 2018Static Malware Detection & Subterfuge: Quantifying the Robustness of Machine Learning and Current Anti-Viruscited by 8
- 2019Malware Evasion Attack and Defensecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.