mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Examining the Threat Landscape: Foundation Models and Model Stealing

arXiv 2502.18077 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models (FMs) for computer vision learn rich and robust representations, enabling their adaptation to task/domain-specific deployments with little to no fine-tuning. However, we posit that the very same strength can make applications based on FMs vulnerable to model stealing attacks. Through empirical analysis, we reveal that models fine-tuned from FMs harbor heightened susceptibility to model stealing, compared to conventional vision architectures like ResNets. We hypothesize that this behavior is due to the comprehensive encoding of visual patterns and features learned by FMs during pre-training, which are accessible to both the attacker and the victim. We report that an attacker is able to obtain 94.28% agreement (matched predictions with victim) for a Vision Transformer based victim model (ViT-L/16) trained on CIFAR-10 dataset, compared to only 73.20% agreement for a ResNet-18 victim, when using ViT-L/16 as the thief model. We arguably show, for the first time, that utilizing FMs for downstream tasks may not be the best choice for deployment in commercial APIs due to their susceptibility to model theft. We thereby alert model owners towards the associated security risks, and highlight the need for robust security measures to safeguard such models against theft. Code is available at https://github.com/rajankita/foundation_model_stealing.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

39 of 46 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  9. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  10. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  11. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  12. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
27 more
  1. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  2. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  3. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  4. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  5. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
  6. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
  7. 2019The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 246
  8. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 214
  9. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 207
  10. 2019Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIscited by 139
  11. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 124
  12. 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 106
  13. 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
  14. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 86
  15. 2018Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Datacited by 70
  16. 2020Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Modelscited by 68
  17. 2020DaST: Data-free Substitute Training for Adversarial Attackscited by 60
  18. 2022Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label Settingcited by 58
  19. 2018Stealing Neural Networks via Timing Side Channelscited by 43
  20. 2022Can't Steal? Cont-Steal! Contrastive Stealing Attacks Against Image Encoderscited by 31
  21. 2021Delving into Data: Effectively Substitute Training for Black-box Attackcited by 27
  22. 2021Black-Box Dissector: Towards Erasing-based Hard-Label Model Stealing Attackcited by 25
  23. 2022StolenEncoder: Stealing Pre-trained Encoders in Self-supervised Learningcited by 23
  24. 2022On the Difficulty of Defending Self-Supervised Learning against Model Extractioncited by 22
  25. 2022How to Steer Your Adversary: Targeted and Efficient Model Stealing Defenses with Gradient Redirectioncited by 21
  26. 2023Dual Student Networks for Data-Free Model Stealingcited by 17
  27. 2018CSI Neural Network: Using Side-channels to Recover Your Artificial Neural Network Informationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.