mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Army of Thieves: Enhancing Black-Box Model Extraction via Ensemble based sample selection

arXiv 2311.04588 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) models become vulnerable to Model Stealing Attacks (MSA) when they are deployed as a service. In such attacks, the deployed model is queried repeatedly to build a labelled dataset. This dataset allows the attacker to train a thief model that mimics the original model. To maximize query efficiency, the attacker has to select the most informative subset of data points from the pool of available data. Existing attack strategies utilize approaches like Active Learning and Semi-Supervised learning to minimize costs. However, in the black-box setting, these approaches may select sub-optimal samples as they train only one thief model. Depending on the thief model's capacity and the data it was pretrained on, the model might even select noisy samples that harm the learning process. In this work, we explore the usage of an ensemble of deep learning models as our thief model. We call our attack Army of Thieves(AOT) as we train multiple models with varying complexities to leverage the crowd's wisdom. Based on the ensemble's collective decision, uncertain samples are selected for querying, while the most confident samples are directly included in the training data. Our approach is the first one to utilize an ensemble of thief models to perform model extraction. We outperform the base approaches of existing state-of-the-art methods by at least 3% and achieve a 21% higher adversarial sample transferability than previous work for models trained on the CIFAR-10 dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  6. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  7. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  8. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  9. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  10. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  11. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  12. 2018Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extractioncited by 84
7 more
  1. 2018Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Datacited by 69
  2. 2020DaST: Data-free Substitute Training for Adversarial Attackscited by 60
  3. 2022Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label Settingcited by 57
  4. 2021Model Extraction and Adversarial Transferability, Your BERT is Vulnerable!cited by 51
  5. 2022Beyond ImageNet Attack: Towards Crafting Adversarial Examples for Black-box Domainscited by 42
  6. 2021Black-Box Dissector: Towards Erasing-based Hard-Label Model Stealing Attackcited by 25
  7. 2020How to 0wn NAS in Your Spare Timecited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.