mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Later Is Better: Token Reduction for ViTs Under Distribution Shift

arXiv 2610.07758 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Token pruning and merging for ViTs

Abstract (arXiv)

Training-free token reduction accelerates vision transformers by removing redundant tokens across layers, recovering most of the original accuracy at a fraction of the compute. These methods, however, are designed and evaluated primarily on clean data, and under real-world distribution shift their accuracy gap to the uncompressed model widens with the removal rate. We show that this gap is governed by the reduction schedule, the depth profile of removal, usually left fixed as an implementation detail. Concretely, we introduce a one-parameter late-concentrated power-law schedule that consistently improves out-of-distribution accuracy over flat at no extra inference cost. On ImageNet-C with DeiT-S, the late schedule closes 83% of that gap at a 26% compute reduction (+1.17pp), and 99% of it at a lighter 7% reduction (+0.26pp). The gain cannot be attributed to retaining more tokens or using extra compute: held to flat's compute, the late schedule removes more tokens in total and leaves fewer tokens at the end, yet still wins. Single-layer probes point to a mechanism: earlier reductions perturb features that pass through more remaining layers, front-loading reduction error in depth. The effect is broad, holding across five token-reduction methods (ToMe, EViT, ATS, ATC, PiToMe), nine backbones, all ImageNet-C corruption types, eight further shift suites, and two further modalities, video and vision-language QA. It is also specific to shift, still positive on clean and rising monotonically to ~4x that at the highest severity 5. The schedule keeps its gain under six test-time adaptation methods, and needs no per-input or per-domain tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Token pruning and merging for ViTs, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 43 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

43 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Lossless Token Merging Even Without Fine-Tuning in Vision Transformers21 May
  2. 2024Accelerating Transformers with Spectrum-Preserving Token Merging25 May
  3. 2023Learned Thresholds Token Merging and Pruning for Vision Transformers20 Jul
  4. 2023DiffRate : Differentiable Compression Rate for Efficient Vision Transformers29 May
  5. 2023Training-Free Acceleration of ViTs with Delayed Spatial Merging4 Mar
  6. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Faster17 Oct

Other references · 37

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  7. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  9. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  10. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  11. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  12. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,305
25 more
  1. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  2. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  3. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
  4. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  5. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  6. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  7. 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Modelscited by 394
  8. 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Tokens for Efficient Vision Transformercited by 360
  9. 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 359
  10. 2016Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaoscited by 260
  11. 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 250
  12. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  13. 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
  14. 2021Adaptive Token Sampling For Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 181
  15. 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 171
  16. 2017Resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry: theory and practicecited by 132
  17. 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 120
  18. 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 98
  19. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  20. 2021Benchmarking the Robustness of Spatial-Temporal Models Against Corruptionscited by 35
  21. 2025Analysing the Robustness of Vision-Language-Models to Common Corruptionscited by 16
  22. 2025Self-Bootstrapping for Versatile Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
  23. 2025NEO: No-Optimization Test-Time Adaptation through Latent Re-Centeringcited by 7
  24. 2024Is Less More? Exploring Token Condensation as Training-free Test-time Adaptationcited by 5
  25. 2025Neutralizing Token Aggregation via Information Augmentation for Efficient Test-Time Adaptationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RAPID: Layer-Wise Redundancy-Aware Pruning and Importance-Driven Token Merging for Efficient ViT
  2. 2023PPT: Token Pruning and Pooling for Efficient Vision Transformers
  3. 2025Token Compression Meets Compact Vision Transformers: A Survey and Comparative Evaluation for Edge AI
  4. 2024Vote&Mix: Plug-and-Play Token Reduction for Efficient Vision Transformer
  5. 2024HiRED: Attention-Guided Token Dropping for Efficient Inference of High-Resolution Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024TPC-ViT: Token Propagation Controller for Efficient Vision Transformer
  7. 2025TinyDrop: Tiny Model Guided Token Dropping for Vision Transformers
  8. 2026MergeOver: Post-Training Token Merging for Recursive Vision Transformers