mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Less More? Exploring Token Condensation as Training-free Test-time Adaptation

arXiv 2410.14729 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) excels at learning generalizable image representations but often falls short in zero-shot inference on certain downstream datasets. Test-time adaptation (TTA) mitigates this issue by adjusting components like normalization layers or context prompts, yet it typically requires large batch sizes and extensive augmentations, leading to high computational costs. This raises a key question: Can VLMs' performance drop in specific test cases be mitigated through efficient, training-free approaches? To explore the solution, we investigate token condensation (TC) techniques, originally designed to enhance vision transformer efficiency by refining token usage during inference. We observe that informative tokens improve visual-text alignment in VLMs like CLIP on unseen datasets. However, existing TC methods often fail to maintain in-distribution performance when reducing tokens, prompting us to ask: How can we transform TC into an effective ``free-lunch'' adaptation strategy for VLMs? To address this, we propose Token Condensation as Adaptation (TCA), a training-free adaptation method that takes a step beyond standard TC. Rather than passively discarding tokens, TCA condenses token representation by introducing reservoir-based domain anchor tokens for information-preserving token reduction and logits correction. TCA achieves up to a 21.4% performance improvement over the strongest baseline on cross-dataset benchmark and the CIFAR-100-Corrupted dataset while reducing GFLOPs by 12.2% to 48.9%, with minimal hyperparameter dependency on both CLIP and SigLIP series.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

61 of 87 references.

References · 61

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  10. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  11. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  12. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
38 more
  1. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  2. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  3. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  4. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  5. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  6. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
  7. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  8. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  9. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  10. 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Modelscited by 394
  11. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
  12. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  13. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  14. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  15. 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Vision Transformers for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 228
  16. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 185
  17. 2021Adaptive Token Sampling For Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 181
  18. 2021Evo-ViT: Slow-Fast Token Evolution for Dynamic Vision Transformercited by 175
  19. 2021SPViT: Enabling Faster Vision Transformers via Soft Token Pruningcited by 165
  20. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
  21. 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuningcited by 150
  22. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 138
  23. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 100
  24. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  25. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersioncited by 82
  26. 2023Joint Token Pruning and Squeezing Towards More Aggressive Compression of Vision Transformerscited by 79
  27. 2023Universal Test-time Adaptation through Weight Ensembling, Diversity Weighting, and Prior Correctioncited by 65
  28. 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?cited by 65
  29. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
  30. 2022Structural Entropy Guided Graph Hierarchical Poolingcited by 62
  31. 2023Zero-TPrune: Zero-Shot Token Pruning through Leveraging of the Attention Graph in Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 61
  32. 2023ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 58
  33. 2021Semantics Disentangling for Generalized Zero-Shot Learningcited by 56
  34. 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
  35. 2023Feature Alignment and Uniformity for Test Time Adaptationcited by 42
  36. 2024A Sober Look at the Robustness of CLIPs to Spurious Featurescited by 38
  37. 2023Test-Time Adaptation with CLIP Reward for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 37
  38. 2023Does CLIP's Generalization Performance Mainly Stem from High Train-Test Similarity?cited by 35

50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TokenFLEX: Unified VLM Training for Flexible Visual Tokens Inference
  2. 2026PACE: A Unified Condense-and-Extract Paradigm for Fast VLM Inference
  3. 2026The Model Knows Which Tokens Matter: Automatic Token Selection via Noise Gating
  4. 2025AdaptInfer: Adaptive Token Pruning for Vision-Language Model Inference with Dynamical Text Guidance
  5. 2026VPRune: Efficient Training-free Pre-LLM Visual Token Pruning
  6. 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024CLIPArTT: Adaptation of CLIP to New Domains at Test Time
  8. 2026One Layer's Trash is Another Layer's Treasure: Adaptive Layer-wise Visual Token Selection in LVLMs