mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MergeOver: Post-Training Token Merging for Recursive Vision Transformers

arXiv 2608.13141 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Token pruning and merging for ViTs

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformers (ViTs) demonstrate exceptional performance in computer vision but suffer from large parameter counts and quadratic computational complexity, severely limiting their deployment on resource-constrained edge hardware. While recursive weight-sharing reduces parameter counts and token merging mitigates computational and memory bottlenecks, integrating these two paradigms without costly retraining is non-trivial, leaving this intersection largely unexplored. We propose MergeOver, a post-training approach that integrates Token Merging (ToMe) into the recursively weight-shared Sliced Recursive Transformer (SReT). Through an Unmerge tracking stack, constraint-safe merge-rate adjustment, and synchronised token-mass tracking across spatial permutations, MergeOver resolves the spatial and merging constraints of this integration. We further employ a stage-wise single-shot schedule that performs token reduction at the first block of each stage and maintains a fixed sequence length throughout its subsequent recursive iterations. Benchmarked on ImageNet-1K, our selected configuration reduces top-1 accuracy by 1.47 percentage points. On the GPU, it reduces peak activation memory by 37.3% and 38.4% at batch sizes 1 and 16, while throughput decreases by 21.7% at batch size 1 but increases by 21.7% at batch size 16. On a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARM CPU), it reduces latency by 2.4% and 17.6% at batch sizes 1 and 16. These results show that MergeOver can recover a meaningful part of the throughput and memory cost that recursive weight-sharing introduces, without retraining, and provides a baseline for combining token merging with hierarchical recursive transformers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Token pruning and merging for ViTs, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

Builds on

10 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Token Fusion: Bridging the Gap between Token Pruning and Token Merging2 Dec

Other references · 9

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
  4. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
  5. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
  6. 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 363
  7. 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
  8. 2021FQ-ViT: Post-Training Quantization for Fully Quantized Vision Transformercited by 151
  9. 2022MiniViT: Compressing Vision Transformers with Weight Multiplexingcited by 88

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023PPT: Token Pruning and Pooling for Efficient Vision Transformers
  2. 2023Training-Free Acceleration of ViTs with Delayed Spatial Merging
  3. 2026Decoder-Agnostic Token Merging for Vision Transformers: A Systematic Study of G2TM
  4. 2025Lossless Token Merging Even Without Fine-Tuning in Vision Transformers
  5. 2026Scaling Vision Transformers Without Training: Prune-and-Merge Token Compression
  6. 2025Where Do Tokens Go? Understanding Pruning Behaviors in STEP at High Resolutions
  7. 2026Later Is Better: Token Reduction for ViTs Under Distribution Shift
  8. 2024TPC-ViT: Token Propagation Controller for Efficient Vision Transformer