NEO: No-Optimization Test-Time Adaptation through Latent Re-Centering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods are often computationally expensive, require a large amount of data for effective adaptation, or are brittle to hyperparameters. Based on a theoretical foundation of the geometry of the latent space, we are able to significantly improve the alignment between source and distribution-shifted samples by re-centering target data embeddings at the origin. This insight motivates NEO -- a hyperparameter-free fully TTA method, that adds no significant compute compared to vanilla inference. NEO is able to improve the classification accuracy of ViT-Base on ImageNet-C from 55.6% to 59.2% after adapting on just one batch of 64 samples. When adapting on 512 samples NEO beats all 7 TTA methods we compare against on ImageNet-C, ImageNet-R and ImageNet-S and beats 6/7 on CIFAR-10-C, while using the least amount of compute. NEO performs well on model calibration metrics and additionally is able to adapt from 1 class to improve accuracy on 999 other classes in ImageNet-C. On Raspberry Pi and Jetson Orin Nano devices, NEO reduces inference time by 63% and memory usage by 9% compared to baselines. Our results based on 3 ViT architectures and 4 datasets show that NEO can be used efficiently and effectively for TTA.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
- 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
14 more
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 184
- 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
- 2020Neural collapse with unconstrained featurescited by 140
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
- 2023Deep Neural Collapse Is Provably Optimal for the Deep Unconstrained Features Modelcited by 43
- 2023Neural Collapse for Unconstrained Feature Model under Cross-entropy Loss with Imbalanced Datacited by 38
- 2024Linguistic Collapse: Neural Collapse in (Large) Language Modelscited by 36
- 2023Optimization-Free Test-Time Adaptation for Cross-Person Activity Recognitioncited by 15
- 2025Controlling Neural Collapse Enhances Out-of-Distribution Detection and Transfer Learningcited by 11
- 2023Unraveling Batch Normalization for Realistic Test-Time Adaptationcited by 10
- 2025E-BATS: Efficient Backpropagation-Free Test-Time Adaptation for Speech Foundation Modelscited by 8
- 2025SURGEON: Memory-Adaptive Fully Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic Activation Sparsitycited by 7
- 2025BoTTA: Benchmarking on-device Test Time Adaptationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Tempora: Characterising the Time-Contingent Utility of Online Test-Time Adaptationcited by 1
- 2026When is Test-Time Adaptation Identifiable From Unlabeled Evidence?cited by 1
- 2026One Pool Is Not Enough: Multi-Cluster Memory for Practical Test-Time Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026UAV-OVO: Out-of-Viewpoint Generalization in UAV Action Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026BayaHAR: Lightweight Bayesian Few-Shot User Adaptation for On-Device Personalized Human Activity Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Not Every Correction Helps: Gain-Guided Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026Later Is Better: Token Reduction for ViTs Under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026Later Is Better: Token Reduction for ViTs Under Distribution Shift6 Oct 2026
- 2026Not Every Correction Helps: Gain-Guided Continual Test-Time Adaptation29 Sep 2026
- 2026When is Test-Time Adaptation Identifiable From Unlabeled Evidence?10 Sep 2026
- 2026BayaHAR: Lightweight Bayesian Few-Shot User Adaptation for On-Device Personalized Human Activity Recognition3 Jun 2026
- 2026UAV-OVO: Out-of-Viewpoint Generalization in UAV Action Recognition25 May 2026
- 2026One Pool Is Not Enough: Multi-Cluster Memory for Practical Test-Time Adaptation22 Mar 2026
- 2026Tempora: Characterising the Time-Contingent Utility of Online Test-Time Adaptation5 Feb 2026