mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Bootstrapping for Versatile Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2504.08010 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we seek to develop a versatile test-time adaptation (TTA) objective for a variety of tasks - classification and regression across image-, object-, and pixel-level predictions. We achieve this through a self-bootstrapping scheme that optimizes prediction consistency between the test image (as target) and its deteriorated view. The key challenge lies in devising effective augmentations/deteriorations that: i) preserve the image's geometric information, e.g., object sizes and locations, which is crucial for TTA on object/pixel-level tasks, and ii) provide sufficient learning signals for TTA. To this end, we analyze how common distribution shifts affect the image's information power across spatial frequencies in the Fourier domain, and reveal that low-frequency components carry high power and masking these components supplies more learning signals, while masking high-frequency components can not. In light of this, we randomly mask the low-frequency amplitude of an image in its Fourier domain for augmentation. Meanwhile, we also augment the image with noise injection to compensate for missing learning signals at high frequencies, by enhancing the information power there. Experiments show that, either independently or as a plug-and-play module, our method achieves superior results across classification, segmentation, and 3D monocular detection tasks with both transformer and CNN models.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.

Builds on

53 of 66 references.

References · 53

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  7. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  8. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  11. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  12. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
38 more
  1. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  2. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  3. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  4. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  5. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  6. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  7. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  8. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  9. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  10. 2019Domain Generalization via Model-Agnostic Learning of Semantic Featurescited by 405
  11. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
  12. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  13. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  14. 2018Generalizing Across Domains via Cross-Gradient Trainingcited by 268
  15. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  16. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  17. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  18. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  19. 2021Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 184
  20. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
  21. 2021Source-free Domain Adaptation via Avatar Prototype Generation and Adaptationcited by 111
  22. 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
  23. 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
  24. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  25. 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
  26. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
  27. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  28. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  29. 2021Test-Time Adaptation to Distribution Shift by Confidence Maximization and Input Transformationcited by 67
  30. 2022Improving Test-Time Adaptation via Shift-agnostic Weight Regularization and Nearest Source Prototypescited by 67
  31. 2021MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaptioncited by 65
  32. 2021SITA: Single Image Test-time Adaptationcited by 57
  33. 2021MixNorm: Test-Time Adaptation Through Online Normalization Estimationcited by 47
  34. 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
  35. 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 38
  36. 2022Video Test-Time Adaptation for Action Recognitioncited by 35
  37. 2024Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 20
  38. 2023Efficient Test-Time Adaptation for Super-Resolution with Second-Order Degradation and Reconstructioncited by 18

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.