mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TrafficSignBench: Rule-Centric Closed-Loop Evaluation of Traffic-Sign Compliance in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2609.38463 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.RO cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing also fits: Imitation-learning end-to-end planners

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous driving planners are typically evaluated using aggregate metrics such as driving score, destination rate, and collision rate, which do not explicitly measure compliance with traffic rules. As a result, planners can achieve high benchmark scores while still exhibiting unsafe or illegal behaviors, limiting their applicability to real-world deployment. To address this gap, we introduce TrafficSignBench, a large-scale, traffic sign-centric benchmark for systematic and interpretable evaluation of traffic-rule compliance in autonomous driving. Our framework combines real-map-based simulation for realistic road layouts with rule-targeted procedural scenario generation for scalable and balanced coverage of underrepresented rules. We implement traffic rules corresponding to 34 traffic signs, each equipped with an automatic rule checker for detecting violations during closed-loop execution. This design yields 29,000 diverse road scenes and 29 distinct testing scenario types, enabling controlled evaluation of rule-specific planner behavior. We construct 5,800 testing scenes and demonstrate that current autonomous driving planners can exhibit poor traffic-rule compliance despite strong performance on standard evaluation metrics. To address this limitation, we transform existing planners into rule-compliant trajectory experts via explicit traffic-sign constraints, enabling scalable generation of high-quality oracle trajectories for fine-tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 36 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  2. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  3. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
  4. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
  5. 2023Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecastingcited by 707
  6. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
  7. 2024NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarkingcited by 354
  8. 2024DiffusionDrive: Truncated Diffusion Model for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 334
  9. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 290
  10. 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 252
  11. 2023Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Researchcited by 160
  12. 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 121
11 more
  1. 2024Towards learning-based planning:The nuPlan benchmark for real-world autonomous drivingcited by 104
  2. 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 84
  3. 2021SafetyNet: Safe planning for real-world self-driving vehicles using machine-learned policiescited by 69
  4. 2024Think2Drive: Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Thinking in Latent World Model for Quasi-Realistic Autonomous Driving (in CARLA-v2)cited by 52
  5. 2025CaRL: Learning Scalable Planning Policies with Simple Rewardscited by 35
  6. 2020The NVIDIA PilotNet Experimentscited by 15
  7. 2025PlanT 2.0: Exposing Biases and Structural Flaws in Closed-Loop Drivingcited by 8
  8. 2025When Planners Meet Reality: How Learned, Reactive Traffic Agents Shift nuPlan Benchmarkscited by 7
  9. 2021Enhancing SUMO simulator for simulation based testing and validation of autonomous vehiclescited by 2
  10. 2025ASVSim (AirSim for Surface Vehicles): A High-Fidelity Simulation Framework for Autonomous Surface Vehicle Researchcited by 2
  11. 2025D-AWSIM: Distributed Autonomous Driving Simulator for Dynamic Map Generation Frameworkcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Driving by the Rules: A Benchmark for Integrating Traffic Sign Regulations into Vectorized HD Map
  2. 2025Closing the Navigation Compliance Gap in End-to-end Autonomous Driving
  3. 2026DriveCombo: Benchmarking Compositional Traffic Rule Reasoning in Autonomous Driving
  4. 2026HiDrive: A Closed-Loop Benchmark for High-Level Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Reasoning to Regulate: Chain-of-Thought for Traffic Rule Understanding
  6. 2025Predictive Traffic Rule Compliance using Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025DriveQA: Passing the Driving Knowledge Test
  8. 2024TrafficGamer: Reliable and Flexible Traffic Simulation for Safety-Critical Scenarios with Game-Theoretic Oracles