mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stored Is Not Supported: Typed Provenance and Assertion Guardrails for Persistent AI Agents

arXiv 2609.02127 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.CRcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Persistent AI agents construct autobiographical state through reflection, retrieval, and consolidation. Persistence changes availability, not epistemic standing: stored or retrieved material is not thereby supported. Untrusted inputs, prompt injections, and model inferences can therefore enter persistent state and later be presented as agent history or user commitments. We specify typed provenance and assertion guardrails for autobiographical assertion boundedness, a system-relative release property requiring governed statements about the agent, user, or named relationships to satisfy accepted-evidence, temporal-validity, and disclosure policies. A typed provenance graph separates origin, dependency lineage, epistemic role, validity, and disclosure scope. A resolver evaluates authorized state projections and returns one evidential status, orthogonal conflict, staleness, and withholding flags, and a protected decision witness. A generate-verify-revise mediator then checks candidate semantic units before release and renders policy-authorized status responses. Under explicit assumptions about extraction, predicate correctness, resolution soundness, view declassification, and channel mediation, we prove a conditional assertion-boundedness contract. In an executable suite of 24 hand-authored conformance cases, typed mediation passed none of 19 unsafe opportunities unqualified while preserving all five supported controls. The flat/prior and source-tag comparison rules released 19/19 and 18/19 unsafe candidates, respectively. These results validate the encoded resolver and mediator obligations; they do not constitute an end-to-end evaluation of language models or retrieval systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MemTX: Transactional Belief Commit for Stateful Agent Memory27 Jul
  2. 2026ConsistencyGate: Preventing Memory Contamination in LLM Agents via Self-Consistency Admission Control25 Jul
  3. 2026Eywa: Provenance-Grounded Long-Term Memory for AI Agents29 May
  4. 2026Mitigating Provenance-Role Collapse in Long-Term Agents via Typed Memory Representation25 May
  5. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory28 Apr
  6. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents17 Feb
  7. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents27 Feb

Other references · 8

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  2. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  3. 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
  4. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
  5. 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 257
  6. 2026Hidden in Memory: Sleeper Memory Poisoning in LLM Agentscited by 27
  7. 2026MemLineage: Lineage-Guided Enforcement for LLM Agent Memorycited by 16
  8. 2026Beyond Memory: A Transactional Continuity Kernel for Long-Lived AI Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Always-OnAgents:A Survey of Persistent Memory, State, and Governance in LLMAgents
  2. 2026Reasoning Provenance for Autonomous AI Agents: Structured Behavioral Analytics Beyond State Checkpoints and Execution Traces
  3. 2026Sleeper Channels and Provenance Gates: Persistent Prompt Injection in Always-on Autonomous AI Agents
  4. 2026Governed Persistent Memory: Source-Bound State Semantics and Fail-Closed Release for Long-Horizon Agents
  5. 2026When Memory Updates but Behavior Does Not: Repairing Implicit Stale Dependencies in Personalized Agent Responses
  6. 2026From Agent Traces to Trust: A Survey of Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
  7. 2026MAP-Graph: Provenance-Aware Shared Memory for Multi-Agent Workflows
  8. 2026Semantic Laundering in AI Agent Architectures: Why Tool Boundaries Do Not Confer Epistemic Warrant