MAP-Graph: Provenance-Aware Shared Memory for Multi-Agent Workflows
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Shared memory helps language-model agents reuse information across long workflows, yet relevant evidence may not be admissible for a particular agent or action. Because restrictions propagate through derivations, summaries can conceal private, poisoned, untrusted, or revoked sources, enabling unauthorized reads or unsafe actions. Existing approaches provide semantic retrieval, scoped access, or lineage tracking, but do not clearly separate hard authorization from graded trust or adapt evidence requirements to action risk. We introduce MAP-Graph, a provenance-aware memory layer that represents agents, sources, memories, claims, and actions in a typed execution graph. It traces ancestry, excludes permission-ineligible records, reranks eligible memories by semantic similarity and multiplicative path trust, and applies a risk-sensitive gate before action execution while retaining affected lineage for audit. On a controlled benchmark of 2,700 synthetic tasks per method across three domains, MAP-Graph achieves 94.96% overall task success, 72.70% exact decision accuracy, and 90.22% in the clean setting, where success requires a correct textscAllow rather than a safe intervention. Ablations isolate the roles of permission filtering, path trust, and action gating, while transfer tests with two additional backbones preserve the exact-decision and access-control advantages. These results support provenance as an operational control signal, rather than only post-hoc audit metadata, within the evaluated setting.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
16 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026From Untrusted Input to Trusted Memory: A Systematic Study of Memory Poisoning Attacks in LLM Agents3 Jun
- 2026Hijacking Agent Memory: Stealthy Trojan Attacks Through Conversational Interaction28 May
- 2026Hidden in Memory: Sleeper Memory Poisoning in LLM Agents14 May
- 2026MemLineage: Lineage-Guided Enforcement for LLM Agent Memory14 May
Other references · 12
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 634
- 2024MemoRAG: Boosting Long Context Processing with Global Memory-Enhanced Retrieval Augmentationcited by 119
- 2024INMS: Memory Sharing for Large Language Model based Agentscited by 31
- 2026Governed Shared Memory for Multi-Agent LLM Systemscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026Modality Disentangled Learning for Incomplete Multimodal Emotion Recognition: A Primitive Memory Distillation Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Explicit State Elicitation Is Not Enough: A Controlled Audit of Memory-Policy Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Noise Floor Audit for Agent Benchmarkscited by 0
- 2026DIAG: Diagnostic Iterative Alignment and Generation for Data-Efficient Mathematical Preference Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Whose record is this? Diagnosing and authorizing record use in personalized multimodal modelscited by 0
- 2026AkasicMEM: Governed Enterprise Memory for Agentscited by 0
- 2026Audience-Bound Persistent Memory: Authorization Across the Memory Lifecyclecited by 0
- 2026Copies or Sources? Measuring How LLM Aggregators Count Restated Evidence in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 0
- 2026The Right Memory in the Wrong Context: Verifying Retrieval Admissibility in Long-Term Agent Memorycited by 0
- 2026The Right Memory in the Wrong Context: Verifying Retrieval Admissibility in Long-Term Agent Memory5 Oct 2026
- 2026Copies or Sources? Measuring How LLM Aggregators Count Restated Evidence in Multi-Agent Systems5 Oct 2026
- 2026Audience-Bound Persistent Memory: Authorization Across the Memory Lifecycle28 Sep 2026
- 2026AkasicMEM: Governed Enterprise Memory for Agents22 Sep 2026
- 2026Whose record is this? Diagnosing and authorizing record use in personalized multimodal models4 Sep 2026
- 2026Modality Disentangled Learning for Incomplete Multimodal Emotion Recognition: A Primitive Memory Distillation Perspective31 Aug 2026
- 2026DIAG: Diagnostic Iterative Alignment and Generation for Data-Efficient Mathematical Preference Distillation24 Aug 2026
- 2026Noise Floor Audit for Agent Benchmarks23 Aug 2026
- 2026Explicit State Elicitation Is Not Enough: A Controlled Audit of Memory-Policy Classification18 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Agent Traces to Trust: A Survey of Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
- 2026Memory Provenance Laundering in LLM Agents: A Non-Amplification Firewall for Persistent Memory
- 2026AgentTrails: Towards Trust and Reuse for Agentic Tasks
- 2025Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control
- 2026Mitigating Provenance-Role Collapse in Long-Term Agents via Typed Memory Representation
- 2026Agent Zero Memory: Provenance-Aware Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents
- 2026CyberClear: A Benchmark for LLM Agent Systems on APT Attack Chain Provenance
- 2026The Granularity Mismatch in Agent Security: Argument-Level Provenance Solves Enforcement and Isolates the LLM Reasoning Bottleneck