Beyond Memory: A Transactional Continuity Kernel for Long-Lived AI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Persistent AI agents accumulate versioned state across long horizons, but storage retention alone does not identify authoritative state. Without an explicit control plane, unmediated updates by models, tools, and background workers risk stale overwrites, un-audited exposures, and self-authorizing privilege escalation. We argue that agent state governance is an infrastructural activation problem, defining continuity as an unbroken, authorized lineage of accepted branch heads. We present the Continuity Kernel (CK), an activation contract that decouples off-commit candidate evaluation from atomic state activation. Untrusted components propose typed changes against an exact predecessor head or typed absence. A short activation transaction revalidates ownership, pre-state authority, freshness, and effect uniqueness, recording one stable disposition (Commit, Reject, Quarantine, or Defer). Only Commit atomically advances the branch head and installs the complete accepted unit (state, authority, lineage, effects, outcome, and receipt). A bounded executable model verifies the protocol across 2,808,230 reachable states and 5,526,474 state-changing transitions with zero invariant violations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 30 references.
References · 6
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 830
- 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memorycited by 779
- 2026Cordon: Semantic Transactions for Tool-Using LLM Agentscited by 22
- 2026MemTX: Transactional Belief Commit for Stateful Agent Memorycited by 15
- 2026MemTxn: A Transaction Boundary for Source-Supported Updates and Complete-State Recovery in Agent Memorycited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Runtime-Independent Persistent Agents: Preserving Identity, Memory, and Code Across Models, Harnesses, and Serverscited by 2
- 2026Stored Is Not Supported: Typed Provenance and Assertion Guardrails for Persistent AI Agentscited by 1
- 2026Where Reliability Lives: Experimental Localisation of Behavioural Properties in an Agent Systemcited by 0
- 2026The Cognitive Continuity Test: Verifying Governed State Transitions in Persistent AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026The Cognitive Continuity Test: Verifying Governed State Transitions in Persistent AI Agents9 Sep 2026
- 2026Where Reliability Lives: Experimental Localisation of Behavioural Properties in an Agent System2 Sep 2026
- 2026Stored Is Not Supported: Typed Provenance and Assertion Guardrails for Persistent AI Agents2 Sep 2026
- 2026Runtime-Independent Persistent Agents: Preserving Identity, Memory, and Code Across Models, Harnesses, and Servers1 Sep 2026