mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgentDV: Closed-Loop Agentic AI for Hardware Design Verification

arXiv 2608.27148 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Register-transfer level (RTL) verification consumes a major part of modern system-on-chip (SoC) development effort. Yet, recent LLM-based verification-code generation often fails to produce runnable, design-consistent, and coverage-producing testbenches. We present AgentDV, a closed-loop agentic AI framework for automated RTL verification environment generation. AgentDV transforms single-shot LLM testbench generation into a tool-grounded verification pipeline by combining LLM-guided analysis, testbench construction, simulation, coverage measurement, and iterative refinement. The framework introduces three key ideas: 1) runnability filtering to reject invalid generated environments, 2) CSR-grounded checking to reduce hallucinated signals and incorrect expected behavior, and 3) coverage-guided iteration to regenerate tests based on measured verification gaps. We evaluate AgentDV using three LLMs on challenge DUTs and public OpenTitan peripheral and security IP blocks. From our analysis, we observed that direct single-shot prompting fails to produce a valid coverage-producing environment on benchmarks. AgentDV achieves 100% pass rate on four DUTs and an average of 80.9% pass rate on all DUTs using Claude Sonnet 4.6. Similarly, an average of 58.7% and 60.6% pass rate is achieved for Llama and Qwen models, respectively. In addition, an average of 74.5%, 69.1%, and 64.9% of line coverage and 88.4%, 82.3%, and 76.7% of branch coverage for the benchmarks under consideration for Claude Sonnet 4.6, Llama, and Qwen models, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025PRO-V-R1: Reasoning Enhanced Programming Agent for RTL Verification13 Jun

Other references · 10

  1. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  2. 2023VerilogEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Verilog Code Generationcited by 246
  3. 2023RTLLM: An Open-Source Benchmark for Design RTL Generation with Large Language Modelcited by 143
  4. 2024AutoBench: Automatic Testbench Generation and Evaluation Using LLMs for HDL Designcited by 38
  5. 2024AssertLLM: Generating and Evaluating Hardware Verification Assertions from Design Specifications via Multi-LLMscited by 30
  6. 2024CorrectBench: Automatic Testbench Generation with Functional Self-Correction using LLMs for HDL Designcited by 23
  7. 2023LLM4DV: Using Large Language Models for Hardware Test Stimuli Generationcited by 21
  8. 2025From Concept to Practice: an Automated LLM-aided UVM Machine for RTL Verificationcited by 8
  9. 2026UVMarvel: an Automated LLM-aided UVM Machine for Subsystem-level RTL Verificationcited by 3
  10. 2026HAVEN: Hybrid Automated Verification ENgine for UVM Testbench Synthesis with LLMscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GoGoTB: Agentic RTL Verification with Specification-Grounded Coverage Closure
  2. 2026Open-Source LLM-Driven Formal Verification: A Multi-Agent Pipeline for RTL Repair
  3. 2025DUET: Agentic Design Understanding via Experimentation and Testing
  4. 2026CovR: Coverage-Aware Hardware Verification via Reasoning-Guided Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026ACE-RTL: When Agentic Context Evolution Meets RTL-Specialized LLMs
  6. 2026Veri-Sure: A Contract-Aware Multi-Agent Framework with Temporal Tracing and Formal Verification for Correct RTL Code Generation
  7. 2026A Survey on LLM-Integrated Hardware Design Verification
  8. 2026Agentic AI-based Coverage Closure for Formal Verification