Towards A Unified Information Bottleneck Framework for Time Series Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explaining deep learning models operating on time series data is crucial in various applications that require transparent and interpretable insights into model behavior. Existing explanation methods generally fall into two categories: attribution-based explanations, which identify the temporal regions most responsible for a prediction, and counterfactual explanations, which reveal how an input should be modified to alter the model's decision. Despite valuable insights, these two fields are largely studied independently. This disconnect leaves attribution methods lacking causal validation, while counterfactual methods suffer from severe instability, producing adversarial-like noise instead of meaningful explanations. In this work, we revisit time-series explainability from an information-theoretic perspective and show that existing explainers are vulnerable to trivial solutions and distributional shifts. To address these limitations, we propose a unified objective function for explainable time series learning that bridges attribution and counterfactual reasoning within a single framework. Building upon the Information Bottleneck principle, our formulation explicitly prevents trivial explanations and out-of-distribution counterfactuals. Based on this objective function, we introduce modelname, a novel explanation framework that learns a parametric transformation network to construct explanation-embedded instances, where preserved information yields attribution explanations and controlled information removal produces stable counterfactual explanations. We evaluate modelname on synthetic and real-world benchmarks against state-of-the-art baselines. Extensive quantitative and qualitative results show that modelname consistently outperforms competing methods, yielding faithful attributions and stable counterfactual explanations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
40 of 61 references.
References · 40
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
- 2020Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Networkcited by 426
28 more
- 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 349
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
- 2018Formal Limitations on the Measurement of Mutual Informationcited by 189
- 2022Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Learning via Stochastic Attention Mechanismcited by 171
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
- 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
- 2019The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanationscited by 97
- 2022Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Explanationscited by 79
- 2020TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbationscited by 74
- 2021Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic Maskscited by 73
- 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
- 2020Towards Unifying Feature Attribution and Counterfactual Explanations: Different Means to the Same Endcited by 66
- 2020Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 64
- 2021Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 52
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 49
- 2021OOD-CV: A Benchmark for Robustness to Out-of-Distribution Shifts of Individual Nuisances in Natural Imagescited by 46
- 2023Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior Consistencycited by 42
- 2021Temporal Dependencies in Feature Importance for Time Series Predictionscited by 27
- 2023Learning Perturbations to Explain Time Series Predictionscited by 23
- 2024Explaining Time Series via Contrastive and Locally Sparse Perturbationscited by 22
- 2023CoRTX: Contrastive Framework for Real-time Explanationcited by 20
- 2024F-Fidelity: A Robust Framework for Faithfulness Evaluation of Explainable AIcited by 18
- 2022Motif-guided Time Series Counterfactual Explanationscited by 12
- 2024M-CELS: Counterfactual Explanation for Multivariate Time Series Data Guided by Learned Saliency Mapscited by 10
- 2022Shapelet-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 9
- 2025Counterfactual Explainable AI (XAI) Method for Deep Learning-Based Multivariate Time Series Classificationcited by 3
- 2025Uncovering Insights of Compound Flooding with Data-Driven AIcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.