mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Error-vs-Discard Characteristic: Toward Stable and Reliable Evaluation for Face Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 2607.22752 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face Image Quality Assessment (FIQA) aims to estimate the utility of facial images for reliable recognition. The evaluation of FIQA methods is predominantly based on the Error-versus-Discard Characteristic (EDC), which evaluates performance by progressively discarding low-quality samples and measuring recognition error on the retained subset. In this work, we demonstrate that the widely used EDC protocol has fundamental limitations: Test-Set Divergence and Threshold Drift, which together limit the reliability and comparability of FIQA methods. To address this, we propose discard-based EDC variants and a rank-based Rank Consistency Evaluation (RCE) metric that operates on the entire test set without discarding samples, using a fixed decision threshold. Extensive experiments on five datasets, four face recognition models, and 15 state-of-the-art FIQA methods demonstrate both the limitations of EDC and the effectiveness of the proposed approaches in enabling a more reliable and comparable evaluation. Despite evaluated on face images only, the limitations arise from the EDC protocol rather than the biometric modality, suggesting a broader applicability to biometric quality assessment in general.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 390
  2. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
  3. 2017Cross-Age LFW: A Database for Studying Cross-Age Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 258
  4. 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 171
  5. 2020SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustnesscited by 111
  6. 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 79
  7. 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 68
  8. 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 63
  9. 2019FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learningcited by 61
  10. 2020Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systemscited by 41
  11. 2023SwinFace: A Multi-task Transformer for Face Recognition, Expression Recognition, Age Estimation and Attribute Estimationcited by 38
  12. 2021Cross-Quality LFW: A Database for Analyzing Cross-Resolution Image Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 33
9 more
  1. 2020Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 31
  2. 2021QMagFace: Simple and Accurate Quality-Aware Face Recognitioncited by 25
  3. 2023DifFIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment Using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 22
  4. 2022FaceQAN: Face Image Quality Assessment Through Adversarial Noise Explorationcited by 17
  5. 2023Considerations on the Evaluation of Biometric Quality Assessment Algorithmscited by 14
  6. 2021Quality Measures in Biometric Systemscited by 12
  7. 2024GraFIQs: Face Image Quality Assessment Using Gradient Magnitudescited by 12
  8. 2025ViT-FIQA: Assessing Face Image Quality using Vision Transformerscited by 7
  9. 2022FaceQgen: Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Face Image Quality Assessmentcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.