mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognition

arXiv 2004.01019 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2020cs.CVcited by 31

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face quality assessment aims at estimating the utility of a face image for the purpose of recognition. It is a key factor to achieve high face recognition performances. Currently, the high performance of these face recognition systems come with the cost of a strong bias against demographic and non-demographic sub-groups. Recent work has shown that face quality assessment algorithms should adapt to the deployed face recognition system, in order to achieve highly accurate and robust quality estimations. However, this could lead to a bias transfer towards the face quality assessment leading to discriminatory effects e.g. during enrolment. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between bias in face recognition and face quality assessment. Experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets captured under controlled and uncontrolled circumstances with two popular face embeddings. We evaluated four state-of-the-art solutions for face quality assessment towards biases to pose, ethnicity, and age. The experiments showed that the face quality assessment solutions assign significantly lower quality values towards subgroups affected by the recognition bias demonstrating that these approaches are biased as well. This raises ethical questions towards fairness and discrimination which future works have to address.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 10; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

31 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
  2. 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 68
  3. 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 63
  4. 2021Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributescited by 31
  5. 2022FairGRAPE: Fairness-aware GRAdient Pruning mEthod for Face Attribute Classificationcited by 30
  6. 2021QMagFace: Simple and Accurate Quality-Aware Face Recognitioncited by 25
  7. 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
  8. 2021Pixel-Level Face Image Quality Assessment for Explainable Face Recognitioncited by 14
  9. 2022Fairness in Face Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 13
  10. 2021A Deep Insight into Measuring Face Image Utility with General and Face-specific Image Quality Metricscited by 12
  11. 2021Unravelling the Effect of Image Distortions for Biased Prediction of Pre-trained Face Recognition Modelscited by 11
  12. 2023Bias and Diversity in Synthetic-based Face Recognitioncited by 11
19 more
  1. 2023Fairness in Visual Clustering: A Novel Transformer Clustering Approachcited by 10
  2. 2022Face Morphing Attacks and Face Image Quality: The Effect of Morphing and the Unsupervised Attack Detection by Qualitycited by 8
  3. 2022Towards Explaining Demographic Bias through the Eyes of Face Recognition Modelscited by 7
  4. 2022The Impact of Racial Distribution in Training Data on Face Recognition Bias: A Closer Lookcited by 7
  5. 2025ViT-FIQA: Assessing Face Image Quality using Vision Transformerscited by 7
  6. 2022Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristicscited by 6
  7. 2023Are Explainability Tools Gender Biased? A Case Study on Face Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 6
  8. 2022Does lossy image compression affect racial bias within face recognition?cited by 5
  9. 2022Assessing Bias in Face Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  10. 2024Model Compression Techniques in Biometrics Applications: A Surveycited by 4
  11. 2022A Survey on Computer Vision based Human Analysis in the COVID-19 Eracited by 3
  12. 2023Pose Impact Estimation on Face Recognition using 3D-Aware Synthetic Data with Application to Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  13. 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distancecited by 1
  14. 2024Fairness measures for biometric quality assessmentcited by 1
  15. 2022Addressing Bias in Face Detectors using Decentralised Data collection with incentivescited by 0
  16. 2025A Lightweight Ensemble-Based Face Image Quality Assessment Method with Correlation-Aware Losscited by 0
  17. 2026Beyond Error-vs-Discard Characteristic: Toward Stable and Reliable Evaluation for Face Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
  18. 2026EXPL-FR: Explaining Face Recognition Models via Vision-Language Alignmentcited by 0
  19. 2026Learning to Attract and Repel: Dual Quality Margin Learning for Face Recognition (DQM-Face)cited by 0