Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligent (AI) powered autonomous agents has fundamentally changed the existing forms of software governance. In spite of the rigorous standards of transparency and account ability required according to the international frameworks such as the European Union's AI Act, there is a considerable gap between theory and reality. The present study discusses the inherent drawbacks of currently utilized platforms for LLM evaluation, machine learning workflow, and application performance monitoring in general. It has been shown that current disjointed solutions fail to protect unbound state space agentic architecture from serious threats such as alignment drift, SaaS security concerns, and unauthorized deployment of shadow AI systems. Moreover, a solution is proposed for overcoming the discussed challenges in form of a coherent multi-level AI governance stack Traccia built on the top of OpenTelemetry infrastructure platform. Traccia resolves the last mile for AI Alignment by adding the telemetry data, passive semantic guardrail assessment, and execution lineage into a hashed trace ledger. Traccia automatically creates compliance evidence packages by appending tamper-resistant fingerprints and SHA-256 content hash, that map to regulatory requirements (Articles 12, 14, 19, 26(6), and 50 of the EU AI Act) without invading any data privacy. By performing this evaluation in a methodical manner, a solid machine-readable base has been created for enterprise-wide management of autonomous AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.
Builds on
28 of 88 references.
References · 28
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 137
- 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
- 2025Probing and Steering Evaluation Awareness of Language Modelscited by 35
- 2018Building Ethics into Artificial Intelligencecited by 19
- 2022Aligned with Whom? Direct and social goals for AI systemscited by 7
- 2025Bridging the Gap in XAI-Why Reliable Metrics Matter for Explainability and Compliancecited by 7
- 2025Interactional Fairness in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: An Evaluation Frameworkcited by 6
- 2025Integrating Traditional Technical Analysis with AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Based Approach to Stock Market Forecastingcited by 6
- 2024False Sense of Security in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 4
- 2025The Unified Control Framework: Establishing a Common Foundation for Enterprise AI Governance, Risk Management and Regulatory Compliancecited by 4
- 2026Mapping Human Anti-collusion Mechanisms to Multi-agent AI Systemscited by 4
16 more
- 2026Timing and Memory Telemetry on GPUs for AI Governancecited by 4
- 2026AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environmentscited by 4
- 2026Detecting Hidden ML Training With Zero-Overhead Telemetrycited by 4
- 2025Specification and Evaluation of Multi-Agent LLM Systems -- Prototype and Cybersecurity Applicationscited by 3
- 2025Interpretability as Alignment: Making Internal Understanding a Design Principlecited by 3
- 2025Reproducibility: The New Frontier in AI Governancecited by 2
- 2026Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundariescited by 2
- 2026Making AI Compliance Evidence Machine-Readablecited by 2
- 2026Engaged AI Governance: Addressing the Last Mile Challenge Through Internal Expert Collaborationcited by 2
- 2025AI Governance in the Context of the EU AI Act: A Bibliometric and Literature Review Approachcited by 1
- 2025One Bad NOFO? AI Governance in Federal Grantmakingcited by 1
- 2025A Taxonomy for Design and Evaluation of Prompt-Based Natural Language Explanationscited by 1
- 2026MALTopic: Multi-Agent LLM Topic Modeling Frameworkcited by 1
- 2026AI Governance Control Stack for Operational Stability: Achieving Hardened Governance in AI Systemscited by 1
- 2026Operational AI Deployment Assurance: Governance-State Orchestration Under Threshold-Sensitive Deployment Conditions -- A Governance Framework for High-Stakes AI Systemscited by 1
- 2026The AI Legal Specialist: A Juridically Autonomous Professional Profile for AI Governancecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Governance Architecture for Autonomous Agent Systems: Threats, Framework, and Engineering Practice
- 2026A Security Analysis of the OpenClaw AI Agent Framework
- 2026Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems
- 2026Architectural Obsolescence of Unhardened Agentic-AI Runtimes
- 2025AGENTSAFE: A Unified Framework for Ethical Assurance and Governance in Agentic AI
- 2026Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Can Open-Source LLM Agents Replace Static Application Security Testing Tools? An Empirical Assessment
- 2026The PBSAI Governance Ecosystem: A Multi-Agent AI Reference Architecture for Securing Enterprise AI Estates