AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The accelerating adoption of large language models, retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, and multi-agent AI workflows has created a structural governance crisis. Organizations cannot govern what they cannot see, and existing compliance methodologies built for deterministic web applications provide no mechanism for discovering or continuously validating AI systems that emerge across engineering teams without formal oversight. The result is a widening trust gap between what regulators demand as proof of AI governance maturity and what organizations can demonstrate. This paper proposes AI Trust OS, a governance architecture for continuous, autonomous AI observability and zero-trust compliance. AI Trust OS reconceptualizes compliance as an always-on, telemetry-driven operating layer in which AI systems are discovered through observability signals, control assertions are collected by automated probes, and trust artifacts are synthesized continuously. The framework rests on four principles: proactive discovery, telemetry evidence over manual attestation, continuous posture over point-in-time audit, and architecture-backed proof over policy-document trust. The framework operates through a zero-trust telemetry boundary in which ephemeral read-only probes validate structural metadata without ingressing source code or payload-level PII. An AI Observability Extractor Agent scans LangSmith and Datadog LLM telemetry, automatically registering undocumented AI systems and shifting governance from organizational self-report to empirical machine observation. Evaluated across ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, SOC 2, GDPR, and HIPAA, the paper argues that telemetry-first AI governance represents a categorical architectural shift in how enterprise trust is produced and demonstrated.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 51 references.
References · 18
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2023Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLMcited by 173
- 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 167
- 2023Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakescited by 101
- 2025AgentSight: System-Level Observability for AI Agents Using eBPFcited by 18
- 2025Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcementcited by 15
- 2025A Practical Guide for Designing, Developing, and Deploying Production-Grade Agentic AI Workflowscited by 13
- 2025Agentsway -- Software Development Methodology for AI Agents-based Teamscited by 12
6 more
- 2025Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoningcited by 12
- 2025Standardization of Psychiatric Diagnoses -- Role of Fine-tuned LLM Consortium and OpenAI-gpt-oss Reasoning LLM Enabled Decision Support Systemcited by 11
- 2025ASTRIDE: A Security Threat Modeling Platform for Agentic-AI Applicationscited by 4
- 2026A Practical Guide to Agentic AI Transition in Organizationscited by 4
- 2025SRE-Llama -- Fine-Tuned Meta's Llama LLM, Federated Learning, Blockchain and NFT Enabled Site Reliability Engineering(SRE) Platform for Communication and Networking Software Servicescited by 2
- 2025SkyEye: When Your Vision Reaches Beyond IAM Boundary Scope in AWS Cloudcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Trustworthy AI Posture (TAIP): A Framework for Continuous AI Assurance of Agentic Systems at Horizontal and Vertical scale
- 2026AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence
- 2025Trustworthy Orchestration Artificial Intelligence by the Ten Criteria with Control-Plane Governance
- 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026TRACE: A Metrologically-Grounded Engineering Framework for Trustworthy Agentic AI Systems in Operationally Critical Domains
- 2026From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems
- 2026Beyond Task Success: An Evidence-Synthesis Framework for Evaluating, Governing, and Orchestrating Agentic AI
- 2026Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification