Aligned with Whom? Direct and social goals for AI systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more powerful and widespread, the AI alignment problem - how to ensure that AI systems pursue the goals that we want them to pursue - has garnered growing attention. This article distinguishes two types of alignment problems depending on whose goals we consider, and analyzes the different solutions necessitated by each. The direct alignment problem considers whether an AI system accomplishes the goals of the entity operating it. In contrast, the social alignment problem considers the effects of an AI system on larger groups or on society more broadly. In particular, it also considers whether the system imposes externalities on others. Whereas solutions to the direct alignment problem center around more robust implementation, social alignment problems typically arise because of conflicts between individual and group-level goals, elevating the importance of AI governance to mediate such conflicts. Addressing the social alignment problem requires both enforcing existing norms on their developers and operators and designing new norms that apply directly to AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.
Builds on
4 of 28 references.
References · 4
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
- 2018Impossibility and Uncertainty Theorems in AI Value Alignment (or why your AGI should not have a utility function)cited by 22
- 2018Agents and Devices: A Relative Definition of Agencycited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025A Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applicationscited by 40
- 2024Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Reviewcited by 19
- 2024Academically intelligent LLMs are not necessarily socially intelligentcited by 12
- 2025From Anger to Joy: How Nationality Personas Shape Emotion Attribution in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Dialogical Reasoning Across AI Architectures: A Multi-Model Framework for Testing AI Alignment Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Demographic Prompting at Scale: When More Attributes Hurt LLM--Human Agreementcited by 0
- 2026Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems15 Jul 2026
- 2026Demographic Prompting at Scale: When More Attributes Hurt LLM--Human Agreement12 Jul 2026
- 2026Dialogical Reasoning Across AI Architectures: A Multi-Model Framework for Testing AI Alignment Strategies28 Jan 2026
- 2025From Anger to Joy: How Nationality Personas Shape Emotion Attribution in Large Language Models3 Jun 2025
- 2025A Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications21 Mar 2025
- 2024Academically intelligent LLMs are not necessarily socially intelligent11 Mar 2024
- 2024Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review13 Feb 2024