mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aligned with Whom? Direct and social goals for AI systems

arXiv 2205.04279 ↗First posted 9 May 2022cs.CY cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more powerful and widespread, the AI alignment problem - how to ensure that AI systems pursue the goals that we want them to pursue - has garnered growing attention. This article distinguishes two types of alignment problems depending on whose goals we consider, and analyzes the different solutions necessitated by each. The direct alignment problem considers whether an AI system accomplishes the goals of the entity operating it. In contrast, the social alignment problem considers the effects of an AI system on larger groups or on society more broadly. In particular, it also considers whether the system imposes externalities on others. Whereas solutions to the direct alignment problem center around more robust implementation, social alignment problems typically arise because of conflicts between individual and group-level goals, elevating the importance of AI governance to mediate such conflicts. Addressing the social alignment problem requires both enforcing existing norms on their developers and operators and designing new norms that apply directly to AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.

Builds on

4 of 28 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
  2. 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
  3. 2018Impossibility and Uncertainty Theorems in AI Value Alignment (or why your AGI should not have a utility function)cited by 22
  4. 2018Agents and Devices: A Relative Definition of Agencycited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

7 papers.