Reproducibility: The New Frontier in AI Governance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI policymakers are responsible for delivering effective governance mechanisms that can provide safe, aligned and trustworthy AI development. However, the information environment offered to policymakers is characterised by an unnecessarily low Signal-To-Noise Ratio, favouring regulatory capture and creating deep uncertainty and divides on which risks should be prioritised from a governance perspective. We posit that the current publication speeds in AI combined with the lack of strong scientific standards, via weak reproducibility protocols, effectively erodes the power of policymakers to enact meaningful policy and governance protocols. Our paper outlines how AI research could adopt stricter reproducibility guidelines to assist governance endeavours and improve consensus on the AI risk landscape. We evaluate the forthcoming reproducibility crisis within AI research through the lens of crises in other scientific domains; providing a commentary on how adopting preregistration, increased statistical power and negative result publication reproducibility protocols can enable effective AI governance. While we maintain that AI governance must be reactive due to AI's significant societal implications we argue that policymakers and governments must consider reproducibility protocols as a core tool in the governance arsenal and demand higher standards for AI research. Code to replicate data and figures: https://github.com/IFMW01/reproducibility-the-new-frontier-in-ai-governance
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
12 of 60 references.
References · 12
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
- 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 286
- 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 185
- 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 174
- 2024Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationscited by 130
- 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 87
- 2024Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AIcited by 48
- 2025Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Developmentcited by 42
- 2020An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Processcited by 23
- 2023Evolving Scientific Discovery by Unifying Data and Background Knowledge with AI Hilbertcited by 18
- 2024What is Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Research?cited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.