mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Making AI Compliance Evidence Machine-Readable

arXiv 2604.13767 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2026cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI Assurance -- producing the machine-readable evidence required to demonstrate compliance with AI governance frameworks -- has mature policy scaffolding but lacks the infrastructure to operationalize it. Organizations building high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act face a gap: frameworks such as the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and NIST AI RMF specify what to assure but provide no executable format for how. This paper proposes OSCAL -- the NIST standard adopted for FedRAMP cybersecurity compliance -- as a candidate interchange format for AI governance, complementing rather than replacing the emerging JTC21 standards stack. We define 16 property extensions covering lifecycle phases, enforcement semantics, risk traceability, and risk-acceptance justification, and present a three-layer Compliance-as-Code architecture (policy, evidence, enforcement) that generates assurance evidence as a byproduct of model training. The SDK produces native OSCAL Assessment Results validated against the NIST JSON schema. We test the approach on two Annex III high-risk systems: a credit scoring model and a medical imaging segmentation system. The architecture and reference implementation are open-source under Apache 2.0.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.