mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Transformer-based Image Matching by Cascaded Capturing Spatially Informative Keypoints

arXiv 2303.02885 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning robust local image feature matching is a fundamental low-level vision task, which has been widely explored in the past few years. Recently, detector-free local feature matchers based on transformers have shown promising results, which largely outperform pure Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based ones. But correlations produced by transformer-based methods are spatially limited to the center of source views' coarse patches, because of the costly attention learning. In this work, we rethink this issue and find that such matching formulation degrades pose estimation, especially for low-resolution images. So we propose a transformer-based cascade matching model -- Cascade feature Matching TRansformer (CasMTR), to efficiently learn dense feature correlations, which allows us to choose more reliable matching pairs for the relative pose estimation. Instead of re-training a new detector, we use a simple yet effective Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) post-process to filter keypoints through the confidence map, and largely improve the matching precision. CasMTR achieves state-of-the-art performance in indoor and outdoor pose estimation as well as visual localization. Moreover, thorough ablations show the efficacy of the proposed components and techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2023.

Builds on

57 of 72 references.

References · 57

  1. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  2. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  4. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
  5. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
  6. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  7. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  8. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  9. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,313
  10. 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
  11. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 974
  12. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
38 more
  1. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
  2. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 731
  3. 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
  4. 2018From Coarse to Fine: Robust Hierarchical Localization at Large Scalecited by 556
  5. 2016Optical Flow Estimation using a Spatial Pyramid Networkcited by 421
  6. 2019Cascade Cost Volume for High-Resolution Multi-View Stereo and Stereo Matchingcited by 414
  7. 2019D2-Net: A Trainable CNN for Joint Detection and Description of Local Featurescited by 324
  8. 2020DISK: Learning local features with policy gradientcited by 310
  9. 2016LIFT: Learned Invariant Feature Transformcited by 305
  10. 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 273
  11. 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 261
  12. 2022LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 228
  13. 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
  14. 2022Visual Attention Networkcited by 210
  15. 2019R2D2: Repeatable and Reliable Detector and Descriptorcited by 206
  16. 2020PatchmatchNet: Learned Multi-View Patchmatch Stereocited by 204
  17. 2021COTR: Correspondence Transformer for Matching Across Imagescited by 182
  18. 2018Neighbourhood Consensus Networkscited by 173
  19. 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 170
  20. 2019GLU-Net: Global-Local Universal Network for Dense Flow and Correspondencescited by 139
  21. 2019SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learningcited by 131
  22. 2020ASLFeat: Learning Local Features of Accurate Shape and Localizationcited by 129
  23. 2022QuadTree Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 129
  24. 2020Patch2Pix: Epipolar-Guided Pixel-Level Correspondencescited by 128
  25. 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
  26. 2020MaskFlownet: Asymmetric Feature Matching with Learnable Occlusion Maskcited by 117
  27. 2021Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Themcited by 113
  28. 2020Visibility-aware Multi-view Stereo Networkcited by 97
  29. 2018Hierarchical Discrete Distribution Decomposition for Match Density Estimationcited by 93
  30. 2020Efficient Neighbourhood Consensus Networks via Submanifold Sparse Convolutionscited by 92
  31. 2020Dual-Resolution Correspondence Networkscited by 90
  32. 2022Incremental Transformer Structure Enhanced Image Inpainting with Masking Positional Encodingcited by 83
  33. 2016Universal Correspondence Networkcited by 82
  34. 2018Real-time self-adaptive deep stereocited by 80
  35. 2021PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Networkcited by 80
  36. 2022Global Matching with Overlapping Attention for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 64
  37. 2022ClusterGNN: Cluster-based Coarse-to-Fine Graph Neural Network for Efficient Feature Matchingcited by 62
  38. 2018Anytime Stereo Image Depth Estimation on Mobile Devicescited by 54

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort: