mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Two-Layer Linear Auto-Regressive Models Estimate Latent States

arXiv 2606.12691 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Auto-regressive models have emerged as powerful tools for sequential data, from language to video. Understanding how and why these models learn latent representations remains an open theoretical question. In this work, we demonstrate that when trained by empirical risk minimization on data from partially observed linear dynamical systems, two-layer linear auto-regressive models naturally learn to approximate Kalman filtering. In particular, we show that the learned hidden representation coincides, up to a similarity transformation, with the state estimates produced by the optimal (Kalman) filter, even though the model has no explicit knowledge of the underlying dynamics or state. The result follows from three main insights. First, we establish that the Kalman filter is well approximated by an auto-regressive model with bounded truncation error. Second, we show that despite non-convexity, the two-layer optimization landscape is benign, i.e., all stationary points are either strict saddles or global minima. Finally, as our main contributions, we provide finite-sample guarantees on prediction error, parameter estimation error, and latent state recovery. Numerical simulations support the theoretical results and demonstrate that the latent representations of auto-regressive models recover state estimates.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

29 of 47 references.

References · 29

  1. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
  2. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 285
  3. 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 243
  4. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  5. 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
  6. 2015Low-rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Procrustes Flowcited by 97
  7. 2016Gradient Descent Learns Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 79
  8. 2018Non-asymptotic Identification of LTI Systems from a Single Trajectorycited by 78
  9. 2021Chess as a Testbed for Language Model State Trackingcited by 72
  10. 2019Finite Sample Analysis of Stochastic System Identificationcited by 67
  11. 2019Learning Linear Dynamical Systems with Semi-Parametric Least Squarescited by 58
  12. 2025What Has a Foundation Model Found? Using Inductive Bias to Probe for World Modelscited by 47
17 more
  1. 2020Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 46
  2. 2022Learning with little mixingcited by 33
  3. 2022Single Trajectory Nonparametric Learning of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 26
  4. 2023A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identificationcited by 26
  5. 2023A New Approach to Learning Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 23
  6. 2023Can a Transformer Represent a Kalman Filter?cited by 20
  7. 2020No-Regret Prediction in Marginally Stable Systemscited by 18
  8. 2023Can Transformers Learn Optimal Filtering for Unknown Systems?cited by 16
  9. 2018The Global Optimization Geometry of Shallow Linear Neural Networkscited by 11
  10. 2019Non-asymptotic Closed-Loop System Identification using Autoregressive Processes and Hankel Model Reductioncited by 9
  11. 2022Globally Convergent Policy Search over Dynamic Filters for Output Estimationcited by 8
  12. 2023Imitation and Transfer Learning for LQG Controlcited by 8
  13. 2023Controlgym: Large-Scale Control Environments for Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 6
  14. 2022Globally Convergent Policy Gradient Methods for Linear Quadratic Control of Partially Observed Systemscited by 5
  15. 2025Universal Learning of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 5
  16. 2022Behavioral Feedback for Optimal LQG Controlcited by 3
  17. 2025Nonconvex Linear System Identification with Minimal State Representationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.