Non-asymptotic Closed-Loop System Identification using Autoregressive Processes and Hankel Model Reduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the primary challenges of system identification is determining how much data is necessary to adequately fit a model. Non-asymptotic characterizations of the performance of system identification methods provide this knowledge. Such characterizations are available for several algorithms performing open-loop identification. Often times, however, data is collected in closed-loop. Application of open-loop identification methods to closed-loop data can result in biased estimates. One method used by subspace identification techniques to eliminate these biases involves first fitting a long-horizon autoregressive model, then performing model reduction. The asymptotic behavior of such algorithms is well characterized, but the non-asymptotic behavior is not. This work provides a non-asymptotic characterization of one particular variant of these algorithms. More specifically, we provide non-asymptotic upper bounds on the generalization error of the produced model, as well as high probability bounds on the difference between the produced model and the finite horizon Kalman Filter.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 52
- 2023A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identificationcited by 26
- 2023A New Approach to Learning Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 23
- 2021Linear Systems can be Hard to Learncited by 20
- 2021Streaming Linear System Identification with Reverse Experience Replaycited by 17
- 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 10
- 2023Non-Asymptotic Pointwise and Worst-Case Bounds for Classical Spectrum Estimatorscited by 4
- 2021Learning Linear Models Using Distributed Iterative Hessian Sketchingcited by 0
- 2026Two-Layer Linear Auto-Regressive Models Estimate Latent Statescited by 0
- 2026Two-Layer Linear Auto-Regressive Models Estimate Latent States10 Jun 2026
- 2023A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identification7 Sep 2023
- 2023Non-Asymptotic Pointwise and Worst-Case Bounds for Classical Spectrum Estimators21 Mar 2023
- 2023A New Approach to Learning Linear Dynamical Systems23 Jan 2023
- 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspective12 Sep 2022
- 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hard27 May 2022
- 2021Learning Linear Models Using Distributed Iterative Hessian Sketching8 Dec 2021
- 2021Linear Systems can be Hard to Learn2 Apr 2021
- 2021Streaming Linear System Identification with Reverse Experience Replay10 Mar 2021