mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NanoResearch: Co-Evolving Skills, Memory, and Policy for Personalized Research Automation

arXiv 2605.10813 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-powered multi-agent systems can now automate the full research pipeline from ideation to paper writing, but a fundamental question remains: automation for whom? Researchers operate under different resource configurations, hold different methodological preferences, and target different output formats. A system that produces uniform outputs regardless of these differences will systematically under-serve every individual user, making personalization a precondition for research automation to be genuinely usable. However, achieving it requires three capabilities that current systems lack: accumulating reusable procedural knowledge across projects, retaining user-specific experience across sessions, and internalizing implicit preferences that resist explicit formalization. We propose NanoResearch, a multi-agent framework that addresses these gaps through tri-level co-evolution. A skill bank distills recurring operations into compact procedural rules reusable across projects. A memory module maintains user- and project-specific experience that grounds planning decisions in each user's research history. A label-free policy learning converts free-form feedback into persistent parameter updates of the planner, reshaping subsequent coordination. These three layers co-evolve: reliable skills produce richer memory, richer memory informs better planning, and preference internalization continuously realigns the loop to each user. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NanoResearch delivers substantial gains over state-of-the-art AI research systems, and progressively refines itself to produce better research at lower cost over successive cycles.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discovery9 Mar
  2. 2025AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation24 May
  3. 2025ResearchCodeAgent: An LLM Multi-Agent System for Automated Codification of Research Methodologies28 Apr
  4. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search10 Apr

Other references · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  4. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  6. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  7. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  8. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  9. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  10. 2019ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmissioncited by 487
  11. 2025Kimi-VL Technical Reportcited by 381
  12. 2024ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Modelscited by 200
12 more
  1. 2020TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documentscited by 136
  2. 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 107
  3. 2019AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligencecited by 84
  4. 2025DeepScientist: Advancing Frontier-Pushing Scientific Findings Progressivelycited by 56
  5. 2024Nova: An Iterative Planning and Search Approach to Enhance Novelty and Diversity of LLM Generated Ideascited by 52
  6. 2025InternAgent: When Agent Becomes the Scientist -- Building Closed-Loop System from Hypothesis to Verificationcited by 41
  7. 2026Aligning Language Models from User Interactionscited by 21
  8. 2025An Empirical Analysis of Uncertainty in Large Language Model Evaluationscited by 20
  9. 2025AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capabilitycited by 20
  10. 2025AutoP2C: An LLM-Based Agent Framework for Code Repository Generation from Multimodal Content in Academic Paperscited by 18
  11. 2026AutoSOTA: An End-to-End Automated Research System for State-of-the-Art AI Model Discoverycited by 17
  12. 2025OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientistscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AutoSci: A Memory-Centric Agentic System for the Full Scientific Research Lifecycle
  2. 2026PaperClaw: Harnessing Agents for Autonomous Research and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement
  3. 2026AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaboration
  4. 2026AI-Supervisor: Autonomous AI Research Supervision via a Persistent Research World Model
  5. 2025Build Your Personalized Research Group: A Multiagent Framework for Continual and Interactive Science Automation
  6. 2025TinyScientist: An Interactive, Extensible, and Controllable Framework for Building Research Agents
  7. 2026MUSE-Autoskill: Self-Evolving Agents via Skill Creation, Memory, Management, and Evaluation
  8. 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Research