mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fewer Tokens, Smaller Cache: Reward-Coordinated Efficient Reasoning

arXiv 2608.04771 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel on complex tasks through long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, but their lengthy intermediate steps cause severe overthinking that inflates inference cost. KV-cache compression is a common solution, yet existing reasoning-oriented methods apply a uniform policy across the trajectory and judge compression only by what it removes from the cache. Two observations point the other way. First, a reasoning state's tolerance to context loss varies along the trajectory, and process reward tracks it: deleting tokens at high-reward steps preserves accuracy far better than deleting the same budget at random. Second, compression is not free on the generation side, since a smaller cache leads the model to generate more tokens, partly canceling the saving. Together these motivate coordinating both sides under a single process reward. We propose ReCo (Reward-Coordinated Compression), a step-wise framework in which a lightweight process-reward estimator scores each completed step and drives three components: (1) reward-adaptive KV-cache compression that shrinks the retained cache harder at high-reward steps and less at low-reward ones, (2) a reward-banded penalty on reflection tokens that curbs redundant generation, and (3) confidence-based early stopping that triggers when the reasoning is reliable. Across three reasoning models and six benchmarks, ReCo reduces generated tokens by 37%-65% and end-to-end latency by 2.08x-2.35x over Full CoT, all while largely preserving accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 35 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

35 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Quantized Reasoning Models Think They Need to Think Longer, but They Do Not29 May
  2. 2026Towards Efficient Large Language Reasoning Models via Extreme-Ratio Chain-of-Thought Compression9 Feb
  3. 2025Don't Overthink It: A Survey of Efficient R1-style Large Reasoning Models4 Aug
  4. 2025Wait, We Don't Need to "Wait"! Removing Thinking Tokens Improves Reasoning Efficiency10 Jun
  5. 2025Done Is Better than Perfect: Unlocking Efficient Reasoning by Structured Multi-Turn Decomposition26 May
  6. 2025Not All Thoughts are Generated Equal: Efficient LLM Reasoning via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning17 May
  7. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
  8. 2025Efficient Reasoning Models: A Survey15 Apr
  9. 2025A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond27 Mar
  10. 2025L1: Controlling How Long A Reasoning Model Thinks With Reinforcement Learning6 Mar
  11. 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs5 Feb
  12. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
2 more
  1. 2024A Survey on Large Language Model Acceleration based on KV Cache Management27 Dec
  2. 2024Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost29 Jul

Other references · 21

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  8. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 633
  9. 2024PyramidKV: Dynamic KV Cache Compression based on Pyramidal Information Funnelingcited by 420
  10. 2025TurboQuant: Online Vector Quantization with Near-optimal Distortion Ratecited by 116
  11. 2024Keep the Cost Down: A Review on Methods to Optimize LLM' s KV-Cache Consumptioncited by 96
  12. 2024Model Tells You Where to Merge: Adaptive KV Cache Merging for LLMs on Long-Context Taskscited by 94
9 more
  1. 2024The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 62
  2. 2024Palu: Compressing KV-Cache with Low-Rank Projectioncited by 59
  3. 2024D2O: Dynamic Discriminative Operations for Efficient Long-Context Inference of Large Language Modelscited by 30
  4. 2025PolarQuant: Quantizing KV Caches with Polar Transformationcited by 24
  5. 2025xKV: Cross-Layer KV-Cache Compression via Aligned Singular Vector Extractioncited by 13
  6. 2026Hierarchical Sparse Attention Done Right: Toward Infinite Context Modelingcited by 8
  7. 2026IndexMem: Learned KV-Cache Eviction with Latent Memory for Long-Context LLM Inferencecited by 7
  8. 2026Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verificationcited by 4
  9. 2026NanoResearch: Co-Evolving Skills, Memory, and Policy for Personalized Research Automationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025R-KV: Redundancy-aware KV Cache Compression for Reasoning Models
  2. 2025Breadcrumbs Reasoning: Memory-Efficient Reasoning with Compression Beacons
  3. 2025Optimizing Length Compression in Large Reasoning Models
  4. 2025Which Heads Matter for Reasoning? RL-Guided KV Cache Compression
  5. 2026CASK: Core-Aware Selective KV Compression for Reasoning Traces
  6. 2026Random Attention: Rethinking KV Cache Eviction for Efficient Reasoning
  7. 2026BeaconKV: Key-Value Cache Compression Guided by Beacon Queries for Efficient Large Reasoning Model Inference
  8. 2026Reasoning as Compression: Unifying Budget Forcing via the Conditional Information Bottleneck