BenchHAR: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Generalizable Sensor-based Activity Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) from wearable sensors supports broad healthcare and behavior science applications. However, data heterogeneity and the scarcity of labeled data limit its real-world generalization. Recent advances in self-supervised learning (SSL) in vision and language domains have shown strong capability for learning generalizable representations from unlabeled data. Yet, few studies have systematically compared the generalization performance of SSL methods or explored how to adapt them for generalizable HAR. To address these gaps, we present BenchHAR, a unified framework for evaluating the generalization capability of SSL methods for sensor-based HAR on unseen target distributions. BenchHAR curates a large-scale dataset (~258K samples) and evaluates eight representative SSL methods across 12 encoder-classifier architectures. Our results reveal that existing SSL methods struggle to achieve satisfactory generalization performance. We find that: (1) For HAR models, the hybrid paradigm (combining reconstruction and contrastive pretraining) achieves the best overall performance. The CNN encoder exhibits the strongest ability to learn generalizable representations, while more expressive classifier architectures further improve generalization. (2) For data scale, increasing the amount of pretraining data from downstream activity classes consistently improves generalization, while adding more labeled data yields limited gains. Interestingly, incorporating unlabeled data from non-downstream activity classes does not improve generalization. (3) Sensor data collected from custom-grade devices generalizes better than that from research-grade devices, and data from limb transfers more effectively to trunk positions. BenchHAR provides a unified benchmark and actionable insights for generalizable sensor-based HAR systems. Our code is available at https://github.com/saiketa/HAR-Bench.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
40 of 75 references.
References · 40
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,175
- 2023One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LMcited by 632
- 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 471
- 2021Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrastingcited by 345
- 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 126
- 2023SimMTM: A Simple Pre-Training Framework for Masked Time-Series Modelingcited by 115
- 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 111
- 2019Multi-task Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Detectioncited by 102
- 2022Self-supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using 700,000 Person-days of Wearable Datacited by 75
28 more
- 2018Mobile Sensor Data Anonymizationcited by 70
- 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 65
- 2024Scaling Wearable Foundation Modelscited by 63
- 2023Soft Contrastive Learning for Time Seriescited by 51
- 2022Self-Supervised Time Series Representation Learning via Cross Reconstruction Transformercited by 47
- 2022What Makes Good Contrastive Learning on Small-Scale Wearable-based Tasks?cited by 40
- 2023FOCAL: Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Time-Series Sensing Signals in Factorized Orthogonal Latent Spacecited by 33
- 2024Scaling Law for Time Series Forecastingcited by 33
- 2022Semantic-Discriminative Mixup for Generalizable Sensor-based Cross-domain Activity Recognitioncited by 29
- 2024UniMTS: Unified Pre-training for Motion Time Seriescited by 26
- 2023DIVERSIFY: A General Framework for Time Series Out-of-distribution Detection and Generalizationcited by 24
- 2024Towards Open Respiratory Acoustic Foundation Models: Pretraining and Benchmarkingcited by 23
- 2022SWL-Adapt: An Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Model with Sample Weight Learning for Cross-User Wearable Human Activity Recognitioncited by 21
- 2024RelCon: Relative Contrastive Learning for a Motion Foundation Model for Wearable Datacited by 20
- 2024CAPTURE-24: A large dataset of wrist-worn activity tracker data collected in the wild for human activity recognitioncited by 19
- 2023Optimization-Free Test-Time Adaptation for Cross-Person Activity Recognitioncited by 18
- 2024Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Taskcited by 15
- 2023Generalizable Low-Resource Activity Recognition with Diverse and Discriminative Representation Learningcited by 12
- 2022Deep Transfer Learning with Graph Neural Network for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 9
- 2024Large Language Model-Guided Semantic Alignment for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 6
- 2025MoPFormer: Motion-Primitive Transformer for Wearable-Sensor Activity Recognitioncited by 6
- 2025Towards Generalizable Human Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 6
- 2021Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors: Review, Challenges, Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 5
- 2024Generalizable Sensor-Based Activity Recognition via Categorical Concept Invariant Learningcited by 5
- 2024Comparing Self-Supervised Learning Techniques for Wearable Human Activity Recognitioncited by 4
- 2025HAROOD: A Benchmark for Out-of-distribution Generalization in Sensor-based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 3
- 2025Experience Paper: Adopting Activity Recognition in On-demand Food Delivery Businesscited by 1
- 2026FEEL: Quantifying Heterogeneity in Physiological Signals for Generalizable Emotion Recognitioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.