mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors: Review, Challenges, Evaluation Benchmark

arXiv 2101.01665 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2021cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recognizing human activity plays a significant role in the advancements of human-interaction applications in healthcare, personal fitness, and smart devices. Many papers presented various techniques for human activity representation that resulted in distinguishable progress. In this study, we conduct an extensive literature review on recent, top-performing techniques in human activity recognition based on wearable sensors. Due to the lack of standardized evaluation and to assess and ensure a fair comparison between the state-of-the-art techniques, we applied a standardized evaluation benchmark on the state-of-the-art techniques using six publicly available data-sets: MHealth, USCHAD, UTD-MHAD, WISDM, WHARF, and OPPORTUNITY. Also, we propose an experimental, improved approach that is a hybrid of enhanced handcrafted features and a neural network architecture which outperformed top-performing techniques with the same standardized evaluation benchmark applied concerning MHealth, USCHAD, UTD-MHAD data-sets.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2021.

Builds on

5 of 25 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Multi-task Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Detectioncited by 98
  2. 2018Human Activity Recognition Based on Wearable Sensor Data: A Standardization of the State-of-the-Artcited by 14
  3. 2019Human Activity Recognition with Convolutional Neural Netowrkscited by 8
  4. 2018PerceptionNet: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Late Sensor Fusioncited by 3
  5. 2020Personalized Activity Recognition with Deep Triplet Embeddingscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.