mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Width Scaling of Neural Optimizers Under Matrix Operator Norms I: Row/Column Normalization and Hyperparameter Transfer

arXiv 2603.09952 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.NA cs.SYcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central question in modern deep learning is how to design optimizers whose behavior remains stable as the network width w increases. We address this question by interpreting several widely used neural-network optimizers, including textrmAdamW and textrmMuon, as instances of steepest descent under matrix operator norms. This perspective links optimizer geometry with the Lipschitz structure of the network forward map, and enables width-independent control of both Lipschitz and smoothness constants. However, steepest-descent rules induced by standard p → q operator norms lack layerwise composability and therefore cannot provide width-independent bounds in deep architectures. We overcome this limitation by introducing a family of mean-normalized operator norms, denoted pmean → qmean, that admit layerwise composability, yield width-independent smoothness bounds, and give rise to practical optimizers such as rescaled textrmAdamW, row normalization, and column normalization. The resulting learning rate width-aware scaling rules recover μP scaling~citeyang2021tensor as a special case and provide a principled mechanism for cross-width learning-rate transfer across a broad class of optimizers. We further show that textrmMuon can suffer an O(√w) worst-case growth in the smoothness constant, whereas a new family of row-normalized optimizers we propose achieves width-independent smoothness guarantees. Based on the observations, we propose MOGA (Matrix Operator Geometry Aware), a width-aware optimizer based only on row/column-wise normalization that enables stable learning-rate transfer across model widths. Large-scale pre-training on GPT-2 and LLaMA shows that MOGA, especially with row normalization, is competitive with Muon while being notably faster in large-token and low-loss regimes.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

51 of 62 references.

References · 51

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  5. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
  6. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
  7. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  8. 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 674
  9. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
  10. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 571
  11. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 434
  12. 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
38 more
  1. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 426
  2. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
  3. 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
  4. 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 193
  5. 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 192
  6. 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 192
  7. 2018AdaGrad stepsizes: Sharp convergence over nonconvex landscapescited by 182
  8. 2017Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradientscited by 139
  9. 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 109
  10. 2025Understanding Gradient Orthogonalization for Deep Learning via Non-Euclidean Trust-Region Optimizationcited by 92
  11. 2025Muon Optimizes Under Spectral Norm Constraintscited by 86
  12. 2025A Note on the Convergence of Muoncited by 83
  13. 2024Modular Duality in Deep Learningcited by 77
  14. 2025Gluon: Making Muon & Scion Great Again! (Bridging Theory and Practice of LMO-based Optimizers for LLMs)cited by 72
  15. 2024Scalable Optimization in the Modular Normcited by 68
  16. 2025ASGO: Adaptive Structured Gradient Optimizationcited by 57
  17. 2023Lion Secretly Solves Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov Predictscited by 51
  18. 2020On the distance between two neural networks and the stability of learningcited by 46
  19. 2025Muon Outperforms Adam in Tail-End Associative Memory Learningcited by 46
  20. 2025Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysiscited by 33
  21. 2025When do spectral gradient updates help in deep learning?cited by 31
  22. 2026Preconditioning Benefits of Spectral Orthogonalization in Muoncited by 30
  23. 2025An Exploration of Non-Euclidean Gradient Descent: Muon and its Many Variantscited by 28
  24. 2022Orthogonalising gradients to speed up neural network optimisationcited by 27
  25. 2024Can We Remove the Square-Root in Adaptive Gradient Methods? A Second-Order Perspectivecited by 25
  26. 2021Tensor Normal Training for Deep Learning Modelscited by 24
  27. 2024SWAN: SGD with Normalization and Whitening Enables Stateless LLM Trainingcited by 20
  28. 2024Curvature-Informed SGD via General Purpose Lie-Group Preconditionerscited by 16
  29. 2025Memory-Efficient LLM Pretraining via Minimalist Optimizer Designcited by 13
  30. 2025Preconditioned Norms: A Unified Framework for Steepest Descent, Quasi-Newton and Adaptive Methodscited by 11
  31. 2025MARS-M: When Variance Reduction Meets Matricescited by 10
  32. 2025Gradient Multi-Normalization for Stateless and Scalable LLM Trainingcited by 9
  33. 2017The duality structure gradient descent algorithm: analysis and applications to neural networkscited by 8
  34. 2025GradPower: Powering Gradients for Faster Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 8
  35. 2019Dual Space Preconditioning for Gradient Descentcited by 7
  36. 2025Understanding the Mechanisms of Fast Hyperparameter Transfercited by 7
  37. 2025Conda: Column-Normalized Adam for Training Large Language Models Fastercited by 5
  38. 2026Why is Normalization Preferred? A Worst-Case Complexity Theory for Stochastically Preconditioned SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noisecited by 2

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.

12 papers.