Demystifying Manifold Constraints in LLM Pre-training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recent success of matrix optimizers (e.g., Muon) suggests that specific normalization of momentum, such as orthogonalization and row-wise normalization, benefits both the stability and acceleration of LLM training. Consequently, several recent studies have suggested that weights should also be normalized, leading to a Riemannian optimization problem. While such constrained training frameworks demonstrate superior performance, the effects of explicitly constraining weights, and their interaction with existing stabilization mechanisms, remain less understood. To bridge this gap, we study manifold constrained training dynamics through activation scales, rotational dynamics, and the update-to-weight ratio. We propose a Riemannian spectral steepest descent optimizer called MACRO, alongside a radius selection principle to serve as our testbed. Our analysis and numerical experiments reveal that RMSNorm and manifold constraints serve overlapping roles, and that weight decay can be completely eliminated when manifold constraints are applied. By controlling the update-to-weight ratio, constrained training significantly alleviates update cancellation, empirically demonstrating that MACRO is robust to low-precision computation and competitive with existing algorithms for standard LLM pre-training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
56 of 80 references.
References · 56
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2016Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 541
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
- 2023Analyzing and Improving the Training Dynamics of Diffusion Modelscited by 396
- 2015Deep Learning with Limited Numerical Precisioncited by 368
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 303
38 more
- 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 177
- 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 173
- 2024BiLLM: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization for LLMscited by 137
- 2017L2 Regularization versus Batch and Weight Normalizationcited by 121
- 2019An Exponential Learning Rate Schedule for Deep Learningcited by 121
- 2018Three Mechanisms of Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 112
- 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 101
- 2024TorchTitan: One-stop PyTorch native solution for production ready LLM pre-trainingcited by 80
- 2025Muon Optimizes Under Spectral Norm Constraintscited by 77
- 2023Why Do We Need Weight Decay in Modern Deep Learning?cited by 70
- 2023A Distributed Data-Parallel PyTorch Implementation of the Distributed Shampoo Optimizer for Training Neural Networks At-Scalecited by 69
- 2024nGPT: Normalized Transformer with Representation Learning on the Hyperspherecited by 68
- 2020Reconciling Modern Deep Learning with Traditional Optimization Analyses: The Intrinsic Learning Ratecited by 59
- 2024Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ_∞ Norm Constrained Optimizationcited by 54
- 2023Rotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networkscited by 50
- 2023Lion Secretly Solves Constrained Optimization: As Lyapunov Predictscited by 50
- 2022Understanding AdamW through Proximal Methods and Scale-Freenesscited by 46
- 2018Decoupled Networkscited by 45
- 2020On the Overlooked Pitfalls of Weight Decay and How to Mitigate Them: A Gradient-Norm Perspectivecited by 25
- 2021Learning by Turning: Neural Architecture Aware Optimisationcited by 23
- 2024Analyzing & Reducing the Need for Learning Rate Warmup in GPT Trainingcited by 22
- 2025Why Gradients Rapidly Increase Near the End of Trainingcited by 21
- 2025Purifying Shampoo: Investigating Shampoo's Heuristics by Decomposing its Preconditionercited by 21
- 2024SWAN: SGD with Normalization and Whitening Enables Stateless LLM Trainingcited by 20
- 2025Training Transformers with Enforced Lipschitz Constantscited by 18
- 2024Transformers Get Stable: An End-to-End Signal Propagation Theory for Language Modelscited by 17
- 2020Revisiting BFloat16 Trainingcited by 15
- 2025Nemotron-Flash: Towards Latency-Optimal Hybrid Small Language Modelscited by 15
- 2026Mano: Restriking Manifold Optimization for LLM Trainingcited by 12
- 2026On the Width Scaling of Neural Optimizers Under Matrix Operator Norms I: Row/Column Normalization and Hyperparameter Transfercited by 11
- 2025Stochastic Rounding for LLM Training: Theory and Practicecited by 10
- 2024Collage: Light-Weight Low-Precision Strategy for LLM Trainingcited by 9
- 2025Gradient Multi-Normalization for Stateless and Scalable LLM Trainingcited by 9
- 2025Memory-Efficient LLM Pretraining via Minimalist Optimizer Designcited by 8
- 2026Manifold constrained steepest descent for smooth and closed-set optimizationcited by 8
- 2025Collaborative Bayesian Optimization via Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 7
- 2025Coreset-Based Task Selection for Sample-Efficient Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2025Learning in Compact Spaces with Approximately Normalized Transformercited by 5
50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.