mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integration

arXiv 2603.03823 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 23

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM)-powered agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in automating software engineering tasks such as static bug fixing. However, in the real world, the development of mature software is typically predicated on complex requirement changes and long-term feature iterations -- a process that static, one-shot repair paradigms fail to capture. To bridge this gap, we propose SWE-CI, the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop, aiming to shift the evaluation paradigm for code generation from static, short-term functional correctness toward dynamic, long-term maintainability. The key insight is simple: Maintainability can be revealed by tracking how functional correctness changes over time. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks, each deriving from a real-world code repository with a development history spanning an average of 233 days and 71 consecutive commits. SWE-CI requires agents to systematically resolve these tasks through dozens of rounds of analysis and coding iterations. SWE-CI provides valuable insights into how well agents can sustain code quality throughout long-term evolution.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfaces15 Feb
  2. 2025SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarios20 Dec

Other references · 21

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  4. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  5. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  6. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
  7. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  8. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
  9. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  10. 2021CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 744
  11. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  12. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 585
9 more
  1. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  2. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
  3. 2023RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systemscited by 353
  4. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 279
  5. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 238
  6. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 203
  7. 2024Commit0: Library Generation from Scratchcited by 52
  8. 2025Let It Flow: Agentic Crafting on Rock and Roll, Building the ROME Model within an Open Agentic Learning Ecosystemcited by 30
  9. 2025SWE-Bench-CL: Continual Learning for Coding Agentscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 23.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026SlopCodeBench: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Degrade Over Long-Horizon Iterative Taskscited by 30
  2. 2026MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AIcited by 17
  3. 2026Agent-as-a-Router: Agentic Model Routing for Coding Taskscited by 10
  4. 2026SWE-Milestone: Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolutioncited by 8
  5. 2026SWE-Chain: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Chained Release-Level Package Upgradescited by 7
  6. 2026SWE Refactor Bench: Can Coding Agents Complete a Long-Horizon, Whole-Repository Stack Migration?cited by 5
  7. 2026TDAD: Test-Driven Agentic Development - Reducing Code Regressions in AI Coding Agents via Graph-Based Impact Analysiscited by 3
  8. 2026Learning to Commit: Generating Organic Pull Requests via Online Repository Memorycited by 3
  9. 2026Chasing the Public Score: User Pressure and Evaluation Exploitation in Coding Agent Workflowscited by 2
  10. 2026Is Agent Code Less Maintainable Than Human Code?cited by 2
  11. 2026Evaluating Skills, Not Just Agents: Agentic Continuous Evaluation of Skillscited by 2
  12. 2026Needle in the Repo: A Benchmark for Maintainability in AI-Generated Repository Editscited by 1
11 more
  1. 2026Banana100: Breaking NR-IQA Metrics by 100 Iterative Image Replications with Nano Banana Procited by 1
  2. 2026StaminaBench: Stress-Testing Coding Agents over 100 Interaction Turnscited by 1
  3. 2026DataClawBench: An Agent Benchmark for Exploratory Real-World Financial Data Analysiscited by 0
  4. 2026Repo2Skill-Evo: Repository Skills Go Stale in Silencecited by 0
  5. 2026Test-Driven Approaches to Software Engineering with Large Language Models: A Survey of Phases, Tasks, and Agent Skillscited by 0
  6. 2026RETRACE: From Entangled Repair Histories to Reusable Experience for CI Repaircited by 0
  7. 2026SWE-Journey: Towards More Realistic Evaluation of Coding Assistants through Long-Horizon, Multi-Turn Interactioncited by 0
  8. 2026Runnable Commit Untangling for Coding Agentscited by 0
  9. 2026SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agentscited by 0
  10. 2026SWE-MISBEHAVIOR: Benchmarking and Mitigating Boundary Violations in Software Coding Agentscited by 0
  11. 2026Definition Grounding in Theory-Level Auto-formalizationcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch
  2. 2026ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance
  3. 2026SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle
  4. 2026SWE Atlas: Benchmarking Coding Agents Beyond Issue Resolution
  5. 2025SWE-Synth: Synthesizing Verifiable Bug-Fix Data to Enable Large Language Models in Resolving Real-World Bugs
  6. 2026A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
  7. 2026SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents
  8. 2026Active-SWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Proactive Bug Fixing without Issue Reports