DataClawBench: An Agent Benchmark for Exploratory Real-World Financial Data Analysis
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous data analysis agents are increasingly expected to conduct exploratory analysis with limited human guidance about data. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate such agents in prior-guided settings, providing selected data sources, explicit data schemas, or cleaned data, thereby understating the exploratory burden. To evaluate this realistic exploratory data analysis task, we introduce DataClawBench, a benchmark built from financial think-tank consulting scenarios where agents must independently explore unfamiliar, noisy, cross-domain data and produce verifiable conclusions. DataClawBench provides a unified real-world data environment with approximately 2.06 million records across enterprise, industry, and policy domains, with native data noise preserved. On top of this data environment, it defines 492 multi-step cross-domain tasks, each annotated with intermediate milestones that diagnose exploration and reasoning failures beyond outcome accuracy. A systematic evaluation of eight advanced LLMs under the OpenClaw agent reveals that exploratory data analysis breaks agent reliability: more exploration does not reliably translate into task-relevant progress or correct final answers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.
Builds on
9 of 41 references.
References · 9
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Taskscited by 63
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Reward Models: Taxonomy, Applications, Challenges, and Futurecited by 53
- 2025DABstep: Data Agent Benchmark for Multi-step Reasoningcited by 44
- 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agentscited by 44
- 2025A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2025From Mind to Machine: The Rise of Manus AI as a Fully Autonomous Digital Agentcited by 33
- 2026SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integrationcited by 18
- 2025FDABench: A Benchmark for Data Agents on Analytical Queries over Heterogeneous Datacited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FinSearchComp: Towards a Realistic, Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoning
- 2026FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use
- 2025FinResearchBench: A Logic Tree based Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation Framework for Financial Research Agents
- 2026Hedge-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks Pertaining to Financial Reasoning
- 2026AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents
- 2025FinDeepResearch: Evaluating Deep Research Agents in Rigorous Financial Analysis
- 2026Mint-Agent: Introducing Finance-Native Agentic Foundation Models
- 2026DataCross: A Unified Benchmark and Agent Framework for Cross-Modal Heterogeneous Data Analysis