mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active-SWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Proactive Bug Fixing without Issue Reports

arXiv 2608.04682 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Coding agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software engineering (SWE) scenarios, capable of fixing a specific bug in large-scale codebase. However, existing SWE benchmarks typically assume that high-quality issue reports with detailed information are always available, which is easily violated in practice due to the complexity of report acquisition and curation. To address this, we introduce Active-SWE, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on proactively discovering and fixing multiple bugs without report guidance, covering 1,663 tasks across six bug categories and eight languages. Beyond shifting the focus from existing reactive bug fixing to proactive bug fixing, Active-SWE enables a more in-depth evaluation by expanding the scope from fixing a specific recorded bug to multiple-bug fixing and potential bug discovery scenarios. To construct Active-SWE, we propose a novel difficulty-aware task formulation pipeline with a dual-track evaluation framework, facilitating comprehensive evaluation of proactive bug-fixing capability. Extensive experiments reveal that most state-of-the-art coding agents struggle with proactive bug-fixing tasks, demonstrating limited performance in locating and resolving recorded bugs, handling multiple bug fixing scenarios, and discovering valid potential bugs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

27 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026SWE Atlas: Benchmarking Coding Agents Beyond Issue Resolution8 May
  2. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering17 Feb
  3. 2026FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature Development11 Feb
  4. 2025Live-SWE-agent: Can Software Engineering Agents Self-Evolve on the Fly?17 Nov
  5. 2025SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents30 Apr
  6. 2024From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future5 Aug
  7. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  8. 2024SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agents18 Jun
  9. 2024MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving18 May
  10. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  11. 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges14 Jan

Other references · 16

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  4. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  5. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
  6. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  7. 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 449
  8. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 254
  9. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
  10. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Survey and Open Problemscited by 178
  11. 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 165
  12. 2025SWE-bench Goes Live!cited by 74
4 more
  1. 2026The MiniMax-M2 Series: Mini Activations Unleashing Max Real-World Intelligencecited by 50
  2. 2026Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexitycited by 48
  3. 2026Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scalecited by 6
  4. 2026TestExplora: Benchmarking LLMs for Proactive Bug Discovery via Repository-Level Test Generationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance
  2. 2026A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
  3. 2025SWE-Synth: Synthesizing Verifiable Bug-Fix Data to Enable Large Language Models in Resolving Real-World Bugs
  4. 2026BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?
  5. 2026SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositories
  6. 2026SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integration
  7. 2026SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents
  8. 2024MarsCode Agent: AI-native Automated Bug Fixing