CRoSS: A Continual Robotic Simulation Suite for Scalable Reinforcement Learning with High Task Diversity and Realistic Physics Simulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual reinforcement learning (CRL) requires agents to learn from a sequence of tasks without forgetting previously acquired policies. In this work, we introduce a novel benchmark suite for CRL based on realistically simulated robots in the Gazebo simulator. Our Continual Robotic Simulation Suite (CRoSS) benchmarks rely on two robotic platforms: a two-wheeled differential-drive robot with lidar, camera and bumper sensor, and a robotic arm with seven joints. The former represent an agent in line-following and object-pushing scenarios, where variation of visual and structural parameters yields a large number of distinct tasks, whereas the latter is used in two goal-reaching scenarios with high-level cartesian hand position control (modeled after the Continual World benchmark), and low-level control based on joint angles. For the robotic arm benchmarks, we provide additional kinematics-only variants that bypass the need for physical simulation (as long as no sensor readings are required), and which can be run two orders of magnitude faster. CRoSS is designed to be easily extensible and enables controlled studies of continual reinforcement learning in robotic settings with high physical realism, and in particular allow the use of almost arbitrary simulated sensors. To ensure reproducibility and ease of use, we provide a containerized setup (Apptainer) that runs out-of-the-box, and report performances of standard RL algorithms, including Deep Q-Networks (DQN) and policy gradient methods. This highlights the suitability as a scalable and reproducible benchmark for CRL research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
- 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
- 2019Learn to Grow: A Continual Structure Learning Framework for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 302
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 268
- 2020The NetHack Learning Environmentcited by 196
- 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradientscited by 122
- 2023Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
- 2021Continual World: A Robotic Benchmark For Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 112
- 2017A Deeper Look at Experience Replaycited by 104
- 2021MiniHack the Planet: A Sandbox for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 96
11 more
- 2019Toward Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learningcited by 67
- 2021Zero Time Waste: Recycling Predictions in Early Exit Neural Networkscited by 39
- 2021CORA: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Metrics as a Platform for Continual Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 36
- 2021Continuous Coordination As a Realistic Scenario for Lifelong Learningcited by 31
- 2020Options of Interest: Temporal Abstraction with Interest Functionscited by 30
- 2019Continual Reinforcement Learning in 3D Non-stationary Environmentscited by 21
- 2025A Survey of Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2020Online Continual Learning on Sequencescited by 13
- 2019Gym-Ignition: Reproducible Robotic Simulations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2024HackAtari: Atari Learning Environments for Robust and Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2022L2Explorer: A Lifelong Reinforcement Learning Assessment Environmentcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.