Assessing the Impact of Typological Features on Multilingual Machine Translation in the Age of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite major advances in multilingual modeling, large quality disparities persist across languages. Besides the obvious impact of uneven training resources, typological properties have also been proposed to determine the intrinsic difficulty of modeling a language. The existing evidence, however, is mostly based on small monolingual language models or bilingual translation models trained from scratch. We expand on this line of work by analyzing two large pre-trained multilingual translation models, NLLB-200 and Tower+, which are state-of-the-art representatives of encoder-decoder and decoder-only machine translation, respectively. Based on a broad set of languages, we find that target language typology drives translation quality of both models, even after controlling for more trivial factors, such as data resourcedness and writing script. Additionally, languages with certain typological properties benefit more from a wider search of the output space, suggesting that such languages could profit from alternative decoding strategies beyond the standard left-to-right beam search. To facilitate further research in this area, we release a set of fine-grained typological properties for 212 languages of the FLORES+ MT evaluation benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2026.
Builds on
32 of 68 references.
References · 32
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 789
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
- 2017Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translationcited by 232
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 143
- 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMscited by 112
- 2024Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages?cited by 62
20 more
- 2018Are All Languages Equally Hard to Language-Model?cited by 53
- 2019What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?cited by 50
- 2018Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modelingcited by 44
- 2021Examining the Inductive Bias of Neural Language Models with Artificial Languagescited by 40
- 2020Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysiscited by 37
- 2024Goldfish: Monolingual Language Models for 350 Languagescited by 27
- 2020It's Easier to Translate out of English than into it: Measuring Neural Translation Difficulty by Cross-Mutual Informationcited by 26
- 2024URIEL+: Enhancing Linguistic Inclusion and Usability in a Typological and Multilingual Knowledge Basecited by 21
- 2025Anything Goes? A Crosslinguistic Study of (Im)possible Language Learning in LMscited by 20
- 2018On the Complexity and Typology of Inflectional Morphological Systemscited by 15
- 2024GlotCC: An Open Broad-Coverage CommonCrawl Corpus and Pipeline for Minority Languagescited by 15
- 2025Confounding Factors in Relating Model Performance to Morphologycited by 14
- 2022DivEMT: Neural Machine Translation Post-Editing Effort Across Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 11
- 2024Emergent Word Order Universals from Cognitively-Motivated Language Modelscited by 11
- 2024Multilingual Gradient Word-Order Typology from Universal Dependenciescited by 9
- 2021On the Difficulty of Translating Free-Order Case-Marking Languagescited by 8
- 2022What do complexity measures measure? Correlating and validating corpus-based measures of morphological complexitycited by 8
- 2016Is Neural Machine Translation Ready for Deployment? A Case Study on 30 Translation Directionscited by 7
- 2016The word entropy of natural languagescited by 6
- 2024How Good is Zero-Shot MT Evaluation for Low Resource Indian Languages?cited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.